←back to thread

2127 points bakugo | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bcherny ◴[] No.43163488[source]
Hi everyone! Boris from the Claude Code team here. @eschluntz, @catherinewu, @wolffiex, @bdr and I will be around for the next hour or so and we'll do our best to answer your questions about the product.
replies(82): >>43163527 #>>43163532 #>>43163549 #>>43163554 #>>43163555 #>>43163576 #>>43163585 #>>43163588 #>>43163589 #>>43163592 #>>43163593 #>>43163632 #>>43163642 #>>43163664 #>>43163677 #>>43163733 #>>43163758 #>>43163789 #>>43163803 #>>43163813 #>>43163821 #>>43163893 #>>43163909 #>>43163915 #>>43163921 #>>43163957 #>>43163958 #>>43163992 #>>43164069 #>>43164089 #>>43164102 #>>43164103 #>>43164104 #>>43164111 #>>43164127 #>>43164158 #>>43164329 #>>43164353 #>>43164424 #>>43164482 #>>43164514 #>>43164585 #>>43164616 #>>43164768 #>>43164797 #>>43164819 #>>43164899 #>>43165002 #>>43165057 #>>43165065 #>>43165088 #>>43165091 #>>43165187 #>>43165308 #>>43165355 #>>43165409 #>>43165468 #>>43165499 #>>43165516 #>>43165570 #>>43165578 #>>43165592 #>>43165836 #>>43165884 #>>43165965 #>>43165976 #>>43165995 #>>43166183 #>>43166711 #>>43166748 #>>43167130 #>>43167804 #>>43168626 #>>43168836 #>>43169047 #>>43169107 #>>43169119 #>>43169294 #>>43169310 #>>43173097 #>>43174353 #>>43192161 #
jiggawatts ◴[] No.43166183[source]
I really want to try your AI models, but "You must have a valid phone number to use Anthropic's services." is a show-stopper for me.

It's the only mainstream AI service that requests this information. After a string of security lapses by many of your competitors, I have zero faith in the ability of a "fast moving" AI-focused company to keep my PII data secure.

replies(2): >>43166848 #>>43167516 #
AdrianEGraphene ◴[] No.43166848[source]
It's a phone number. It's probably been bought / sold a few times already. Unless you're on the level of Edward Snowden, I wouldn't worry about it. But maybe your sense of privacy is more valuable than the outcome you'd get from Claude. That's fine too.
replies(1): >>43167338 #
1. jiggawatts ◴[] No.43167338[source]
It's my phone number... linked to my Google identity... linked to every submitted user prompt... linked to my source code.

There's also been a spate of AI companies rushing to release products and having "oops" moments where they leaked customer chats or whatever.

They're not run like a FAANG, they don't have the same security pedigree, and they generally don't have any real guarantee of privacy.

So yes, my privacy is more valuable.

Conversely: Why is my non-privacy so valuable to Anthropic? Do they plan on selling my data? Maybe not now... but when funding gets a bit tight? Do they plan on selling my information to the likes of Cambridge Analytica? Not just superficial metadata, but also an AI-summarised history of my questions?

The best thing to do would be not to ask. But they are asking.

Why?

Why only them?

replies(2): >>43168081 #>>43169592 #
2. goatsi ◴[] No.43168081[source]
It's an anti abuse method. A valid phone number will always have a cost for spammers/multi accounters to obtain in mass, but will have no cost for the desired user base (the assumption is that every worthwhile user already has a phone).

Captchas are trivially broken and you can get access to millions of residential IP addresses, but phone numbers (especially if you filter out VOIP providers) still have a cost.

3. dist-epoch ◴[] No.43169592[source]
Just buy a $5 burner phone number. No need to use your real one.