←back to thread

2127 points bakugo | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.395s | source | bottom
1. Copenjin ◴[] No.43165526[source]
Very good, Code is extremely nice but as others have said, if you let it go on its own it burns through your money pretty fast.

I've made it build a web scraper from scratch, figuring out the "API" of a website using a project from github in another language to get some hints, and while in the end everything was working, I've seen 100k+ tokens being sent too frequently for apparently simple requests, something feels off, it feels like there are quite a few opportunities to reduce token usage.

replies(3): >>43166683 #>>43168873 #>>43172347 #
2. ◴[] No.43166683[source]
3. joelthelion ◴[] No.43168873[source]
It probably makes sense to continue using third party tools such as aider, for now. Anthropic doesn't have a lot of incentives to reduce token usage.
replies(2): >>43169053 #>>43178891 #
4. Copenjin ◴[] No.43169053[source]
Yes, thinking the same thing here.
5. jamiedumont ◴[] No.43172347[source]
That was my sense too. Used it for a few similar programs today (like converting HTML to Markdown but parsing certain <figure> elements to shortcodes) and scaffolding a Rust web app.

It's done a reasonable job — but rips through credit, often changing its mind. Even strong-arming it into choosing an approach, it wanted to flip-flop between using regex and lol_html to parse the HTML whenever it came across a difficulty.

If you're a US developer on whatever multiple of $ to the £ that I earn it might make sense, but burning through $100p/h for a pair programmer is a bit rich for my blood.

6. mil22 ◴[] No.43178891[source]
Apart from, of course, the incentive of being undercut on price by the competition at (likely soon) a similar level of performance.