←back to thread

320 points ingve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ABS ◴[] No.43112124[source]
money quote:

  "if Microsoft’s claim stands, then topological qubits have finally reached some sort of parity with where more traditional qubits were 20-30 years ago. I.e., the non-topological approaches like superconducting, trapped-ion, and neutral-atom have an absolutely massive head start: there, Google, IBM, Quantinuum, QuEra, and other companies now routinely do experiments with dozens or even hundreds of entangled qubits, and thousands of two-qubit gates. Topological qubits can win if, and only if, they turn out to be so much more reliable that they leapfrog the earlier approaches—sort of like the transistor did to the vacuum tube and electromechanical relay. Whether that will happen is still an open question, to put it extremely mildly."
replies(3): >>43112572 #>>43113006 #>>43113014 #
tromp ◴[] No.43112572[source]
The quote that struck me was

> I foresee exciting times ahead, provided we still have a functioning civilization in which to enjoy them.

replies(2): >>43113467 #>>43115037 #
gauge_field ◴[] No.43115037[source]
If you are shocked by this, I suggest not reading his other recent topics.
replies(2): >>43115785 #>>43116994 #
moshun ◴[] No.43115785[source]
Spent an hour going through his blog. Wild and unpleasant ride.
replies(3): >>43116510 #>>43117753 #>>43118892 #
tdb7893 ◴[] No.43117753{3}[source]
It's interesting to see someone who seems to describe themself as anti-woke try desperately to convince the generally anti-academic movement to fund academics. Sadly I don't think he'll succeed in this.

I don't agree with many of his posts but I think the blog is interesting in how personal it feels. Often I feel like all media is very cultivated but he seems very willing to put his own anxieties and foibles on the web.

replies(1): >>43118845 #
KerrAvon ◴[] No.43118845{4}[source]
FWIW, it's unclear how the NSF ends up. Musk needs scientists to make rockets go. The defense industry needs a broad spectrum of scientists to make all kinds of things happen. Scientists (and especially the schools producing said scientists) need funding to operate, or there will no longer be accredited scientists.

Does Musk understand this? Maybe not. It's not evident so far. He certainly lives in a fictional world of the right wing's devising. Will someone else be able to penetrate that bubble to make him understand it? Will he care if they do? Guess we'll find out.

replies(1): >>43124379 #
1. stogot ◴[] No.43124379{5}[source]
Why do all schools need public money? The big ones have huge endowments, why not use those? They also make a ton of money from students. Much of it is wasted on layers of administrators, but the administrators will just fire the scientists for not bringing in grants