←back to thread

310 points greenie_beans | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
redcobra762 ◴[] No.43115368[source]
I genuinely don't understand why the focus is on egg prices. Who out there is paying more than a total of $3-$5/month more in eggs? And no, even to the absolutely poorest among us, that's not a meaningful amount.

Yes, egg prices, as a percentage are going up a lot, but as an absolute value? I can get a dozen eggs from Walmart right now for $5.46. That isn't, by any measurement, a lot of money more than I would have paid a year ago.

replies(13): >>43115570 #>>43115576 #>>43115584 #>>43115912 #>>43116309 #>>43116669 #>>43117902 #>>43118082 #>>43118610 #>>43119272 #>>43119283 #>>43120190 #>>43136398 #
qoez ◴[] No.43115570[source]
People who work out a lot eat way way more than $5 in eggs per month; maybe $5 per day is more accurate (it's not only the rich who want to work out).
replies(2): >>43116667 #>>43121182 #
1. tomjakubowski ◴[] No.43121182[source]
OP was talking about a $3-$5 per month increase, not a $3-$5 monthly total spend. This isn't the first comment in the first thread to miss that though so maybe OP could have worded it more clearly.