←back to thread

320 points ingve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ABS ◴[] No.43112124[source]
money quote:

  "if Microsoft’s claim stands, then topological qubits have finally reached some sort of parity with where more traditional qubits were 20-30 years ago. I.e., the non-topological approaches like superconducting, trapped-ion, and neutral-atom have an absolutely massive head start: there, Google, IBM, Quantinuum, QuEra, and other companies now routinely do experiments with dozens or even hundreds of entangled qubits, and thousands of two-qubit gates. Topological qubits can win if, and only if, they turn out to be so much more reliable that they leapfrog the earlier approaches—sort of like the transistor did to the vacuum tube and electromechanical relay. Whether that will happen is still an open question, to put it extremely mildly."
replies(3): >>43112572 #>>43113006 #>>43113014 #
tromp ◴[] No.43112572[source]
The quote that struck me was

> I foresee exciting times ahead, provided we still have a functioning civilization in which to enjoy them.

replies(2): >>43113467 #>>43115037 #
gauge_field ◴[] No.43115037[source]
If you are shocked by this, I suggest not reading his other recent topics.
replies(2): >>43115785 #>>43116994 #
moshun ◴[] No.43115785[source]
Spent an hour going through his blog. Wild and unpleasant ride.
replies(3): >>43116510 #>>43117753 #>>43118892 #
darknavi ◴[] No.43116510[source]
The comments section of that blog is truly a wild ride.
replies(1): >>43120678 #
1. fc417fc802 ◴[] No.43120678[source]
As it should be.

> For most of my professional life, this blog has been my forum, where anyone in the world could show up to raise any issue they wanted, as if we were tunic-wearing philosophers in the Athenian agora.

https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=6576