←back to thread

310 points greenie_beans | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
helsinkiandrew ◴[] No.43112744[source]
> Family-sized egg operations create resiliency

This would probably create resiliency for egg supply, but given that a source of bird flu is wild birds and transfer to and from humans would increase mutations wouldn't it likely increase probability of more bird flu and more human cases?

replies(1): >>43112770 #
rscho ◴[] No.43112770[source]
It would likely much increase salmonella infections. Which currently appears as a far nastier problem.
replies(1): >>43112796 #
Cthulhu_ ◴[] No.43112796[source]
How's that? I know American eggs get cleaned and bleached, but that doesn't happen in Europe yet salmonella is not a huge issue.

(cleaning eggs also removes some of its natural barriers, making it mandatory to refrigerate them to keep them edible)

replies(3): >>43113005 #>>43113279 #>>43114985 #
rscho ◴[] No.43113005[source]
Industrial eggs are tightly controlled. Homemade eggs are far more susceptible to infection. AFAIK, scrubbing eggs like in the US is generally a bad idea, and results in the need to refrigerate them.
replies(2): >>43113695 #>>43117992 #
1. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.43117992{4}[source]
> Homemade eggs are far more susceptible to infection

Source? I buy small-farm eggs all the time. The industrial ones need sanitisation because of the literally shit condition the birds are kept in.