←back to thread

181 points jxmorris12 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
roger_ ◴[] No.43114156[source]
An aside: please use proper capitalization. With this article I found myself backtracking thinking I’d missed a word, which was very annoying. Not sure what the authors intention was with that decision but please reconsider.
replies(10): >>43114383 #>>43114612 #>>43114856 #>>43115887 #>>43116286 #>>43116852 #>>43118606 #>>43118611 #>>43118802 #>>43121504 #
1dom ◴[] No.43114383[source]
I agree.

I'm all for Graham's pyramid of disagreement: we should focus on the core argument, rather than superfluous things like tone, or character, or capitalisation.

But this is too much for me personally. I just realised I consider the complete lack of capitalisation on a piece of public intellectual work to be obnoxious. Sorry, it's impractical, distracting and generates unnecessary cognitive load for everyone else.

You're the top comment right now, and it's not about the content of the article at all, which is a real shame. All the wasted thought cycles across so many people :(

replies(3): >>43114533 #>>43116890 #>>43131729 #
jiggawatts ◴[] No.43114533[source]
It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially.

It's the new black turtleneck that everyone is wearing, but will swear upon their mother's life isn't because they're copying Steve Jobs.

replies(6): >>43114614 #>>43114925 #>>43114949 #>>43115025 #>>43115758 #>>43118040 #
alchemist1e9 ◴[] No.43114925[source]
> It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially.

I know this is true but does anyone understand why they do it? It is actually cognitively disruptive when reading content because many of us are trained to simultaneously proof read while reading.

So I also consider it a type of cognitive attack vector and it annoys me extremely as well.

replies(4): >>43115130 #>>43115526 #>>43116022 #>>43118309 #
saghm ◴[] No.43115130[source]
The sibling comment to yours mentions that this is pretty common on Twitter, and I'd guess that it started as a way to making firing off tweets from a phone easier (since the extra effort to hit shift when typing on a phone keyboard is a bit higher, and the additional effort to go back and fix any typos that happen due to trying to capitalize things is also higher compared to using a traditional keyboard). Once enough people were doing it there, the style probably became recognizable and evoked a certain "vibe" that people wanted to replicate elsewhere, including in places where the original context of "hitting the shift key is more work than it's worth" doesn't hold as well.
replies(1): >>43115947 #
bowsamic ◴[] No.43115947[source]
> since the extra effort to hit shift when typing on a phone keyboard is a bit higher, and the additional effort to go back and fix any typos that happen due to trying to capitalize things is also higher compared to using a traditional keyboard

I'm a bit confused about this. Do people turn off auto capitalisation on their phones? I very rarely have to press shift on my phone

replies(2): >>43117933 #>>43118302 #
1. saghm ◴[] No.43117933{6}[source]
I hadn't considered that. My best guess is that it was originally an intentional decision based on consistency with nouns that people might have mid-sentence that they can't rely on autocorrect to capitalize properly.