←back to thread

320 points ingve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.745s | source
Show context
strangeloops85 ◴[] No.43116931[source]
A very important statement is in the peer review file that everyone should read:

"The editorial team wishes to point out that the results in this manuscript do not represent evidence for the presence of Majorana zero modes in the reported devices. The work is published for introducing a device architecture that might enable fusion experiments using future Majorana zero modes."

https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs415...

replies(4): >>43116972 #>>43117723 #>>43118603 #>>43123263 #
1. gsf_emergency_2 ◴[] No.43117723[source]
As the recent results from CS and math on the front pages have shown, one doesn't have to be unknown or underfunded in order to produce verifiable breakthroughs, but it might help..

Seems like John Baez didn't notice those lines in the peer review either

https://mathstodon.xyz/@johncarlosbaez/114031919391285877

TIL: read the peer review first