←back to thread

181 points jxmorris12 | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
roger_ ◴[] No.43114156[source]
An aside: please use proper capitalization. With this article I found myself backtracking thinking I’d missed a word, which was very annoying. Not sure what the authors intention was with that decision but please reconsider.
replies(10): >>43114383 #>>43114612 #>>43114856 #>>43115887 #>>43116286 #>>43116852 #>>43118606 #>>43118611 #>>43118802 #>>43121504 #
timdellinger ◴[] No.43116286[source]
an opinion, and a falsifiable hypothesis:

call me old-fasahioned, but two spaces after a period will solve this problem if people insist on all-lower-case. this also helps distinguish between abbreviations such as st. martin's and the ends of sentences.

i'll bet that the linguistics experimentalists have metrics that quantify reading speed measurements as determined by eye tracking experiments, and can verify this.

replies(2): >>43116635 #>>43118850 #
thaumasiotes ◴[] No.43116635[source]
> [I]'ll bet that the linguistics experimentalists have metrics that quantify reading speed measurements as determined by eye tracking experiments, and can verify this.

You appear to be trolling for the sake of trolling, but for reference: reading speed is determined by familiarity with the style of the text. Diverging from whatever people are used to will make them slower.

There is no such thing as "two spaces" in HTML, so good luck with that.

replies(1): >>43117174 #
1. recursive ◴[] No.43117174{3}[source]
> There is no such thing as "two spaces" in HTML, so good luck with that.

Code point 160 followed by 32. In other words `  ` will do it.

replies(1): >>43118758 #
2. nomel ◴[] No.43118758[source]
There's: U+3000, ideographic space. It's conceptually fitting, with sentence separation being a good fit for "idea separation".

edit: well I tried to give an example, but hn seems to replace it with regular space. Here's a copy paste version: https://unicode-explorer.com/c/3000

replies(1): >>43119988 #
3. agalunar ◴[] No.43119988[source]
Belying the name somewhat, I believe U+3000 is specifically meant for use with Sinoform logographs, having the size of a (fullwidth character) cell, and so it makes little sense in other contexts.
replies(1): >>43121625 #
4. nomel ◴[] No.43121625{3}[source]
The extended horizontal size is the only goal here. The dimensions for a sinoform is still related to pt size, so the relative spacing, compared to chr(32), at the same pt size, is reasonably larger.

But...the vertical dimensions don't scale so well, at least in my browser. It causes a slight downward shift.

replies(1): >>43122042 #
5. agalunar ◴[] No.43122042{4}[source]
You’d perhaps be better off using U+2002 EN SPACE (or the canonically equivalent U+2000 EN QUAD).

From what I recall, the size of a typical interword space is ⅓ of an em, and traditionally a bit more than this is inserted between sentences (but less than ⅔ of an em). The period itself introduces a fair amount of negative space, and only a skosh more is needed if any.