←back to thread

Grok 3: Another win for the bitter lesson

(www.thealgorithmicbridge.com)
129 points kiyanwang | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.394s | source
Show context
smy20011 ◴[] No.43112235[source]
Did they? Deepseek spent about 17 months achieving SOTA results with a significantly smaller budget. While xAI's model isn't a substantial leap beyond Deepseek R1, it utilizes 100 times more compute.

If you had $3 billion, xAI would choose to invest $2.5 billion in GPUs and $0.5 billion in talent. Deepseek, would invest $1 billion in GPUs and $2 billion in talent.

I would argue that the latter approach (Deepseek's) is more scalable. It's extremely difficult to increase compute by 100 times, but with sufficient investment in talent, achieving a 10x increase in compute is more feasible.

replies(10): >>43112269 #>>43112330 #>>43112430 #>>43112606 #>>43112625 #>>43112895 #>>43112963 #>>43115065 #>>43116618 #>>43123381 #
1. SamPatt ◴[] No.43115065[source]
R1 came out when Grok 3's training was still ongoing. They shared their techniques freely, so you would expect the next round of models to incorporate as many of those techniques as possible. The bump you would get from the extra compute occurs in the next cycle.

If Musk really can get 1 million GPUs and they incorporate some algorithmic improvements, it'll be exciting to see what comes out.