←back to thread

Grok 3: Another win for the bitter lesson

(www.thealgorithmicbridge.com)
129 points kiyanwang | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
ArtTimeInvestor ◴[] No.43112245[source]
It looks like the USA is bringing all technology in-house that is needed to build AI.

TSMC has a factory in the USA now, ASML too. OpenAI, Google, xAI and Nvidia are natively in the USA.

While no other country is even close to build AI on their own.

Is the USA going to "own" the world by becoming the keeper of AI? Or is there an alternative future that has a probability > 0?

replies(7): >>43112250 #>>43112266 #>>43112288 #>>43112313 #>>43113081 #>>43113084 #>>43113181 #
lompad ◴[] No.43112266[source]
You implicitly assume, LLMs are actually important enough to make a difference on the geopolitical level.

So far, I haven't seen any indication that this is the case. And I'd say, hyped up speculations by people financially incentivized to hype AI should be taken with an entire mine full of salt.

replies(5): >>43112290 #>>43112419 #>>43112691 #>>43112716 #>>43113043 #
ArtTimeInvestor ◴[] No.43112290[source]
First, its not just about LLMs. Its not an LLM that replaced human drivers in Waymo cars.

Second, how could AI not be the deciding geopolitical factor of the future? You expect progress to stop and AI not to achieve and surpass human intelligence?

replies(3): >>43112319 #>>43112382 #>>43112437 #
Eikon ◴[] No.43112319[source]
> You expect progress to stop and AI not to achieve and surpass human intelligence?

A word generator is not intelligence. There’s no “thinking” involved here.

To surpass human intelligence, you’d first need to actually develop intelligence, and llms will not be it.

replies(1): >>43112519 #
willvarfar ◴[] No.43112519[source]
I get that LLMs are just doing a probabilistic prediction etc. Its all Hutter Prize stuff.

But how are animals with nerve-centres or brains different? What do we think us humans do differently so we are not just very big probabilistic prediction systems?

A completely different tack: if we develop the technology to engineer animal-style nerves and form them into big lumps called 'brains', in what way is that not artificial and intelligence? And if we can do that, what is to stop that manufactured brain from not being twice or ten times larger than a humans?

replies(6): >>43112567 #>>43112751 #>>43112930 #>>43113206 #>>43113272 #>>43113546 #
1. dkjaudyeqooe ◴[] No.43112567[source]
Human (and other animal) brains probably are probabilistic, but we don't understand their structure or mechanism in fine enough detail to replicate them, or simulate them.

People think LLMs are intelligent because intelligence is latent within the text they digest, process and regurgitate. Their performance reflects this trick.