←back to thread

301 points SerCe | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.62s | source
Show context
Oras ◴[] No.43112544[source]
Looking at industrial robots they don't mimic how humans do things, and hence, they are efficient. That's why I don't understand how these propsals to teach robots how humans do things will make any sense.

To have robots at homes, they will need their tools to be efficient. It will not be the same washing machine, oven, or dishwasher that we use now, there will be new ones made for robots.

replies(12): >>43112553 #>>43112554 #>>43112591 #>>43112618 #>>43112651 #>>43112668 #>>43112768 #>>43113074 #>>43113652 #>>43113785 #>>43114875 #>>43116101 #
1. whatever1 ◴[] No.43112554[source]
But Humans generalize very well across tasks. You can have an employee driving a forklift, then stop pick-up a pallet that blocks his way and continue.
replies(1): >>43113475 #
2. Oras ◴[] No.43113475[source]
And robots will not do that either, what if the employee used hearing to determine if there is a hazard (another moving vehicle around) before jumping to pick a pallet? How would the robot know by just “looking”? How to prioritise visuals, audio, sense … etc?
replies(1): >>43114657 #
3. qgin ◴[] No.43114657[source]
There's no reason to expect models won't be able to handle this even better than humans.