←back to thread

Grok 3: Another win for the bitter lesson

(www.thealgorithmicbridge.com)
129 points kiyanwang | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
ArtTimeInvestor ◴[] No.43112245[source]
It looks like the USA is bringing all technology in-house that is needed to build AI.

TSMC has a factory in the USA now, ASML too. OpenAI, Google, xAI and Nvidia are natively in the USA.

While no other country is even close to build AI on their own.

Is the USA going to "own" the world by becoming the keeper of AI? Or is there an alternative future that has a probability > 0?

replies(7): >>43112250 #>>43112266 #>>43112288 #>>43112313 #>>43113081 #>>43113084 #>>43113181 #
lompad ◴[] No.43112266[source]
You implicitly assume, LLMs are actually important enough to make a difference on the geopolitical level.

So far, I haven't seen any indication that this is the case. And I'd say, hyped up speculations by people financially incentivized to hype AI should be taken with an entire mine full of salt.

replies(5): >>43112290 #>>43112419 #>>43112691 #>>43112716 #>>43113043 #
ArtTimeInvestor ◴[] No.43112290[source]
First, its not just about LLMs. Its not an LLM that replaced human drivers in Waymo cars.

Second, how could AI not be the deciding geopolitical factor of the future? You expect progress to stop and AI not to achieve and surpass human intelligence?

replies(3): >>43112319 #>>43112382 #>>43112437 #
1. ozornin ◴[] No.43112437[source]
> how could AI not be the deciding geopolitical factor of the future?

Easily. Natural resources, human talent, land and supply chains all are and will be more important factors than AI

> You expect progress to stop

no

> and AI not to achieve and surpass human intelligence

yes