The Plan 9 Foundation

(plan9foundation.org)

Show context

vander_elst ◴[20 Feb 25 07:35 UTC] No.43112078[source]▶

>>43112036 (OP) #

hug of death for the website? It takes a lot of time to load and sometimes if fails.

replies(1): >>43112100 #

1. ggm ◴[20 Feb 25 07:40 UTC] No.43112100[source]▶

>>43112078 #

I want to make a very unfair joke at this point. I'm pretty sure we've all felt it about dogfooding, at one point or another. But in truth, it would be supposition.

Any site can get hugged to death or have a bad day.

replies(1): >>43112212 #

2. rcarmo ◴[20 Feb 25 08:02 UTC] No.43112212[source]▶

>>43112100 (TP) #

None of the Plan9 HTTP servers I tried was particularly scalable—although you could build your own in Go and it would run OK.

replies(3): >>43112443 #>>43112665 #>>43117196 #

3. ggm ◴[20 Feb 25 08:35 UTC] No.43112443[source]▶

>>43112212 #

Put the Web on K9P and stay inside plan9 to manage content but accept scaleable pods to serve it?

Cheating.. but it's at least a red headed bastard grandchild

4. pjmlp ◴[20 Feb 25 09:10 UTC] No.43112665[source]▶

>>43112212 #

At that point, maybe it should be The Inferno Foundation, and have it written in Limbo.

replies(1): >>43113820 #

5. rcarmo ◴[20 Feb 25 12:16 UTC] No.43113820{3}[source]▶

>>43112665 #

It would probably actually work very well, considering my very limited experience with the dis VM.

6. yjftsjthsd-h ◴[20 Feb 25 17:03 UTC] No.43117196[source]▶

>>43112212 #

Did you happen to look at caddy? It at least used to have some degree of support for plan9: https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/issues/1093

replies(1): >>43118532 #

7. rcarmo ◴[20 Feb 25 18:50 UTC] No.43118532{3}[source]▶

>>43117196 #

Nah. The whole ethos of Plan9 doesn’t really play well with popular stuff :)

↑