←back to thread

611 points sohkamyung | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
rodary ◴[] No.43110391[source]
Anecdotal but...

Broke my femur neck on a mountain bike. Surgery, plates and screws. Surgeon said no weight on the broken bone for 8 weeks and no walking on it for 12. And then we'll see he said.

In 4 weeks I was on a trainer (fork fixed to the trainer). Started easy with 30min sessions and then increased time and force applied to the pedals.

After 2 weeks of "riding", started putting weight on the bone with short walks around the house.

8 weeks after the surgery rocked up to a road race, still on crutches because walking was still a bit uncomfy but being on the bike was fine. Raced to a 3rd place (Masters A) with hard breakaways and all.

12 weeks after the surgery go to see the surgeon to check if I can start walking (already walking by this stage as normal). He X-rays me and says your bone is fully healed. Strange but good he said.

I told him the story. Still don't know if he believed me.

replies(11): >>43110425 #>>43110838 #>>43111314 #>>43111448 #>>43111486 #>>43112008 #>>43112118 #>>43112714 #>>43113227 #>>43115662 #>>43118792 #
notShabu ◴[] No.43111314[source]
The cost of this increased healing rate would be the tail risk of compounding injury though. It's not something a doctor could recommend even if it were true for everyone consistently.
replies(2): >>43112005 #>>43112791 #
1. lennxa ◴[] No.43112005[source]
if it were true for everyone consistently (faster better healing), where does the tail risk come from?
replies(2): >>43117920 #>>43131636 #
2. PoignardAzur ◴[] No.43117920[source]
You fall and break something.
3. adrianN ◴[] No.43131636[source]
Even if the outcome distribution is the same for everyone and the expected outcome is better healing, you can increase the risk of much worse outcomes if the distribution has the right shape.