←back to thread

Broken legs and ankles heal better if you walk on them within weeks

(www.scientificamerican.com)
611 points sohkamyung | 1 comments | 19 Feb 25 12:36 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ehnto ◴[19 Feb 25 14:04 UTC] No.43102277[source]▶
The pathology for broken collar bones was changing right as I took up mountain biking, and subsequently shattered my collarbone.

It was hotly debated at the hospital, if my specific case should be operated on or not. Each time I had a checkup, one doctor would say "wait and see" while the other was saying "I can't believe we didn't operate on this".

At any rate, the outcome was as good as if they had operated on it, according to the doc anyway. Nice of them to test it out on me!

More related to this though, I have broken both my collarbones, the first time I had little direction and just held my arm still for 2-3 months. It took forever to heal, and my arm atrophied significantly. The second time, similar severity. I was guided through rehab and I was back using my arm within the first month, very little atrophy.

replies(12): >>43102620 #>>43102787 #>>43103353 #>>43103595 #>>43104336 #>>43104668 #>>43104764 #>>43105603 #>>43107976 #>>43108047 #>>43108510 #>>43109812 #
edwcross ◴[19 Feb 25 14:58 UTC] No.43102787[source]▶
Given the amount of injuries related to mountain biking, is there some specific insurance needed for it? It seems one of those "net-negative for the society activities", like trampolines.
replies(13): >>43102883 #>>43102963 #>>43102966 #>>43103105 #>>43103130 #>>43103177 #>>43103227 #>>43103336 #>>43103827 #>>43104259 #>>43104338 #>>43106116 #>>43106419 #
ghaff ◴[19 Feb 25 15:07 UTC] No.43102883[source]▶
In general, "society" deciding what activities are too dangerous to routinely allow is a really nasty slope. Yes, there's some special insurance offered through private organizations for things like higher altitude mountaineering. But it's not that big a step to rule that any contact sport, for example, should require special insurance. I'm sure the insurance companies wouldn't mind.
replies(2): >>43102980 #>>43103280 #
4ggr0 ◴[19 Feb 25 15:17 UTC] No.43102980[source]▶
One thing which comes to mind is - why should we stop at sports, then? we'll immediately be at the point where smokers, alcoholics, obese people etc. should pay more, after all, their way of life statistically causes higher costs.

(i don't think either of those things should result in higher insurance prices, just continuing the thought.)

replies(6): >>43103056 #>>43103122 #>>43103316 #>>43108915 #>>43113052 #>>43115756 #
1. AngryData ◴[19 Feb 25 23:05 UTC] No.43108915[source]▶
I don't know about alcoholics, but smokers and obese people actually cost less in medical care because they usually die before age-related diseases takes hold which are the most expensive, they most often die of heart attack and stroke which are the cheapest deaths, and being fat or a smoker disqualifies you from many procedures and operations that they otherwise would do without hesitation.

On top of that for smokers, the amount of sin taxes they pay on cigarettes over their lifetime almost always exceeds their entire life-time medical costs.