←back to thread

681 points NetOpWibby | 10 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source | bottom

Hey everyone,

About a year ago I embarked on creating a color scheme for a project and I loved it so much I began using it for everything. I decided to make an official repo for it to share with the world.

Anyhoo, hope y'all enjoy it.

1. bl4kers ◴[] No.43073186[source]
All I see is black text on a white background. I'm using Firefox on Android. I assume it's supposed to show more?
replies(7): >>43073194 #>>43073202 #>>43073208 #>>43074810 #>>43075891 #>>43076556 #>>43076898 #
2. James_K ◴[] No.43073194[source]
Same here, but on chromium PC.
replies(1): >>43073251 #
3. chefandy ◴[] No.43073202[source]
If you can’t scroll down to see various swatch sets grouped by shade then you’re not seeing what you’re supposed to see. Works fine on FF for me but I don’t have Android.
4. esseph ◴[] No.43073208[source]
Also using ff on Android.

No problems.

5. chefandy ◴[] No.43073251[source]
Maybe a broken cache on an edge network serving up a bad asset to only some geographic areas, or something that was served broken for a moment but got cached.
6. zarzavat ◴[] No.43074810[source]
I also see just black text on white, on iOS / Mobile Safari.

I assumed it was a joke, like motherfuckingwebsite.com. But it seems that other people are seeing colors.

7. defanor ◴[] No.43075891[source]
Same, with Firefox on a Linux desktop, even after enabling JS.

Edit: apparently it uses Oklab/oklch() [1], which is supposet to work in Firefox since version 113, but does not seem to work in 115. Or possibly it also uses something else that breaks it.

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/color_value...

8. nullpilot ◴[] No.43076556[source]
It uses CSS nesting[1] (think SCSS) which requires Firefox 117 and Chrome 120 for full support[2]

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Nesting_sel...

[2] https://caniuse.com/css-nesting

9. IYasha ◴[] No.43076898[source]
Same on FF 50 on Linux.

I don't know how to call people who ignore backwards-compatibility. My sites work on IE6 if needed.

replies(1): >>43078103 #
10. ◴[] No.43078103[source]