←back to thread

641 points shortformblog | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
timmg ◴[] No.42949719[source]
I assume they get "monetization" from Youtube and they don't need to worry about hosting or discovery. Probably better than doing nothing with these films.
replies(5): >>42949781 #>>42949826 #>>42950060 #>>42957115 #>>42963845 #
bluedevil2k ◴[] No.42950060[source]
The only 2 companies that made money during the “streaming wars” were Netflix, which had the infrastructure in place already and didn’t need to build anything from scratch, and Sony, which decided not to build any streaming service and just license all its content out. Seems WBD is following the lead of a winner.

* https://www.yahoo.com/tech/sony-succeeded-becoming-powerful-...

replies(4): >>42950285 #>>42950752 #>>42953195 #>>42959225 #
jshen ◴[] No.42953195[source]
Disney has been profitable lately.

Also odd to say that Netflix had the infrastructure already. They built it from scratch.

replies(2): >>42954537 #>>42966005 #
jonny_eh ◴[] No.42966005{3}[source]
Also YouTube has been somewhat profitable.
replies(1): >>42969179 #
1. jshen ◴[] No.42969179{4}[source]
Yeah, never understood why YouTube isn't included in these lists.
replies(1): >>42977183 #
2. jonny_eh ◴[] No.42977183[source]
It's only the largest streaming platform. I think people just take it for granted. Like indoor plumbing.