←back to thread

S1: A $6 R1 competitor?

(timkellogg.me)
851 points tkellogg | 2 comments | 05 Feb 25 11:05 UTC | HN request time: 0.427s | source
Show context
advael ◴[06 Feb 25 07:36 UTC] No.42960025[source]▶
I'm strictly speaking never going to think of model distillation as "stealing." It goes against the spirit of scientific research, and besides every tech company has lost my permission to define what I think of as theft forever
replies(3): >>42962125 #>>42963994 #>>43000776 #
eru ◴[06 Feb 25 13:34 UTC] No.42962125[source]▶
At most it would be illicit copying.

Though it's poetic justice that OpenAI is complaining about someone else playing fast and loose with copyright rules.

replies(3): >>42963268 #>>42963479 #>>42966120 #
1. antimatter15 ◴[06 Feb 25 20:20 UTC] No.42966120[source]▶
It's hardly even illicit- at least in the United States, the output of an AI isn't copyrightable.
replies(1): >>42969247 #
2. eru ◴[07 Feb 25 04:04 UTC] No.42969247[source]▶
Was that decided in courts, yet?

In any case, copyright ain't the only thing that prevents copying.