←back to thread

S1: A $6 R1 competitor?

(timkellogg.me)
851 points tkellogg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.387s | source
Show context
advael ◴[] No.42960025[source]
I'm strictly speaking never going to think of model distillation as "stealing." It goes against the spirit of scientific research, and besides every tech company has lost my permission to define what I think of as theft forever
replies(3): >>42962125 #>>42963994 #>>43000776 #
eru ◴[] No.42962125[source]
At most it would be illicit copying.

Though it's poetic justice that OpenAI is complaining about someone else playing fast and loose with copyright rules.

replies(3): >>42963268 #>>42963479 #>>42966120 #
downrightmike ◴[] No.42963479[source]
The First Amendment is not just about free speech, but also the right to read, the only question is if AI has that right.
replies(4): >>42964640 #>>42965071 #>>42967832 #>>42968680 #
1. rig666 ◴[] No.42965071[source]
Does my software have the right to read the contents of a DVD and sell my own MP4 of it then no. If a streamer plays a YouTube video on there channel is the content original then yes. When gpt3 was training people saw it as a positive. When people started asking chatgpt more things than searching sites it became a negative.