←back to thread

757 points headalgorithm | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
neuroelectron ◴[] No.42952761[source]
Google's attack on RSS has been quite successful. Not a single mention here in the 150+ comments. I would think the HN crowd would be savvy enough to recommend it on this subject.
replies(2): >>42953267 #>>42957375 #
denkmoon ◴[] No.42957375[source]
The content of the "news" has little to do with its conveyance protocol? Whether you get it from foxnews.com or foxnews.com/rss (insert your favoured antagonist here)
replies(1): >>42960699 #
1. neuroelectron ◴[] No.42960699[source]
You're not really looking at the big picture. RSS allows you to escape social media filter bubbles, allows you to read the articles without an internet connection which removes a lot of the algorithmic capture of engagement and allows you to precisely control where your information comes from. You have to actively seek out new sources of information instead of having them fed to you.