(tedium.co)

641 points shortformblog | 1 comments | 05 Feb 25 14:47 UTC | HN request time: 0.312s | source

Show context

giancarlostoro ◴[05 Feb 25 16:56 UTC] No.42951399[source]▶

Anything from before the 1980s should just be on YouTube, its easy cash for them on films that are sitting idle otherwise. Anything they aren't licensing to anyone anywhere should just be on YouTube. Or any sort of streaming platform that has sane ads, and anyone can see. It is really sad to me there's no genuine YouTube competitor.

replies(3): >>42952692 #>>42952896 #>>42960112 #

1. interludead ◴[06 Feb 25 07:52 UTC] No.42960112[source]▶

>>42951399 #

But I think that the real shame is that there's no true YouTube competitor for ad-supported streaming

↑

Why is Warner Bros. Discovery putting old movies on YouTube?