←back to thread

757 points headalgorithm | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.426s | source
Show context
joshdavham ◴[] No.42950233[source]
One thing to consider for those of us who are more sensitive to online outrage is to just quit social media all together. I’m technically gen z and I’ve been off of social media (aside from HN, WhatsApp and discord) for years and you wouldn’t believe how great it’s been for my overall state of mind.

Reddit, instagram, X, Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn, Threads, etc are all the equivalent of digital junk food and I’d argue that we’re all a lot more negatively affected by it than we think. There’s a reason ‘brain rot’ was word of the year.

replies(52): >>42950320 #>>42950336 #>>42950445 #>>42950473 #>>42951182 #>>42951436 #>>42951814 #>>42951934 #>>42951963 #>>42952084 #>>42952101 #>>42952182 #>>42952192 #>>42952227 #>>42952628 #>>42952897 #>>42953078 #>>42953222 #>>42953419 #>>42953803 #>>42954274 #>>42954441 #>>42954731 #>>42954909 #>>42954954 #>>42954988 #>>42955155 #>>42955212 #>>42955289 #>>42955294 #>>42955418 #>>42956109 #>>42956724 #>>42956961 #>>42956964 #>>42957605 #>>42957866 #>>42958342 #>>42958365 #>>42959482 #>>42959947 #>>42960118 #>>42960167 #>>42960565 #>>42960840 #>>42965103 #>>42965157 #>>42965320 #>>42966271 #>>42967557 #>>42968099 #>>42968645 #
sporkydistance ◴[] No.42952227[source]
Why do you exclude HN from your list? It is literally social media, but with the dial turned down a little. Yet, you don't have to dig to deeply to see flamewars, outrage, and trolling. I mean, look at many of the garbage comments in this very thread that are on par with /.,xchan.
replies(7): >>42952427 #>>42952449 #>>42954294 #>>42955187 #>>42957446 #>>42958790 #>>42962349 #
vaylian ◴[] No.42954294[source]
If HN is social media, then old online forums from the time before "social media" are also social media.
replies(1): >>42954663 #
Klonoar ◴[] No.42954663[source]
Well, yes.

That’s not really a gotcha statement.

replies(2): >>42954827 #>>42954901 #
switchbak ◴[] No.42954901[source]
Sure, but it’s also not a useful distinction.

There’s a clear difference of kind between modern social media and the forums/usenet of old.

replies(2): >>42956385 #>>42959558 #
sporkydistance ◴[] No.42956385[source]
I really would like to know what exactly you consider a "clear difference" between how Usenet and differ conceptually (e.g., ignoring the GUI, the # of users, and mechanics, [e.g., usenet updates diffused around the globe because we didn't have cloud servers]).

Please back that statement up with some facts.

replies(2): >>42959405 #>>42959967 #
1. musicale ◴[] No.42959405[source]
1. Centralized control by for-profit corporations (and their investors) chasing perpetual growth

2. Algorithms driving ever-increasing "engagement" to deliver advertising

3. Surveillance capitalism

replies(1): >>42997235 #
2. sporkydistance ◴[] No.42997235[source]
Sorry, I was refering to Hacker News, not all social media. My question was unclear.

1. HN is centralized, but not for-profit.

2. HN does not drive engagement, AFAIK

3. HN is not surveillance capitalism.

You haven't demonstrated how Usenet differs from HN, but since my question had a typo and omitted HN, I can see how that is confusing.