←back to thread

641 points shortformblog | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
softwaredoug ◴[] No.42949755[source]
These are movies nobody is lining up to syndicate, for a company desperate for cash. Why not dump them on YouTube and get a bit of ad revenue? It’s low effort relative to the income it generates. Even if it’s unlikely to make much money.
replies(1): >>42949880 #
ninth_ant ◴[] No.42949880[source]
The why not is because it potentially devalues the prestige of the individual work’s IP, and the brand in general.

This is short-term optimization, par for the course with the new Disovery-owned Warner Bros.

replies(5): >>42950203 #>>42950258 #>>42950274 #>>42951067 #>>42953932 #
1. derbOac ◴[] No.42953932[source]
I think prestige is hard to gauge from availability channels, and ebbs and flows. Sometimes visibility even increases interest and regard, if it's a sort of forgotten film.

Night of the Living Dead has been freely available for some time for example and is still considered a classic of horror. I'm not sure it hurt Criterion when they released a version of it. People are paying for the restoration and extras.