←back to thread

641 points shortformblog | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
timmg ◴[] No.42949719[source]
I assume they get "monetization" from Youtube and they don't need to worry about hosting or discovery. Probably better than doing nothing with these films.
replies(5): >>42949781 #>>42949826 #>>42950060 #>>42957115 #>>42963845 #
browningstreet ◴[] No.42949826[source]
I'm a little surprised there isn't more of this. Building a streaming service is pretty expensive.. a lot of the platforms lost money doing so and really only made it back when they merged into an umbrella of other services.

I'm also a little surprised no one has yet (AFAIK) done the "viral indie release to Youtube" path. I feel like it's sitting there waiting to be exploited.

replies(14): >>42949920 #>>42949930 #>>42949946 #>>42949960 #>>42949992 #>>42950028 #>>42950040 #>>42950138 #>>42950363 #>>42950811 #>>42950881 #>>42951000 #>>42952373 #>>42963396 #
wslh ◴[] No.42949920[source]
Could you please expand on your "viral indie release to Youtube" idea? I am just a YT basic user and don't know what is there and what is not beyond HN, random videos, and my relatively simple use cases (e.g. music videos, and movie trailers).
replies(1): >>42949993 #
ryanmcbride ◴[] No.42949993{3}[source]
Indie film makers release a lot of their work on youtube.
replies(1): >>42950036 #
browningstreet ◴[] No.42950036{4}[source]
There hasn't really been a Blair Witch Project movie happening on Youtube yet...
replies(3): >>42950898 #>>42952016 #>>42953927 #
1. ryanmcbride ◴[] No.42953927{5}[source]
Just because the quality of the things people upload there isn't up to the arbitrary standards of "as good as the Blair Witch Project" doesn't mean its less valuable