←back to thread

1303 points serjester | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
cedws ◴[] No.42953112[source]
90% accuracy +/- 10%? What could that be useful for, that’s awfully low.
replies(7): >>42953249 #>>42953392 #>>42953432 #>>42953490 #>>42953775 #>>42953853 #>>42954057 #
1. serjester ◴[] No.42953775[source]
Author here — measuring accuracy in table parsing is surprisingly challenging. Subtle, almost imperceptible differences in how a table is parsed may not affect the reader's understanding but can significantly impact benchmark performance. For all practical purposes, I'd say it's near perfect (also keep in mind the benchmark is on very challenging tables).