Most active commenters
  • throwawaythekey(5)
  • intended(4)
  • foldr(4)
  • rightbyte(4)
  • Terr_(3)
  • deathanatos(3)
  • caminante(3)
  • (3)
  • myko(3)

←back to thread

757 points headalgorithm | 87 comments | | HN request time: 0.003s | source | bottom
Show context
joshdavham ◴[] No.42950233[source]
One thing to consider for those of us who are more sensitive to online outrage is to just quit social media all together. I’m technically gen z and I’ve been off of social media (aside from HN, WhatsApp and discord) for years and you wouldn’t believe how great it’s been for my overall state of mind.

Reddit, instagram, X, Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn, Threads, etc are all the equivalent of digital junk food and I’d argue that we’re all a lot more negatively affected by it than we think. There’s a reason ‘brain rot’ was word of the year.

replies(52): >>42950320 #>>42950336 #>>42950445 #>>42950473 #>>42951182 #>>42951436 #>>42951814 #>>42951934 #>>42951963 #>>42952084 #>>42952101 #>>42952182 #>>42952192 #>>42952227 #>>42952628 #>>42952897 #>>42953078 #>>42953222 #>>42953419 #>>42953803 #>>42954274 #>>42954441 #>>42954731 #>>42954909 #>>42954954 #>>42954988 #>>42955155 #>>42955212 #>>42955289 #>>42955294 #>>42955418 #>>42956109 #>>42956724 #>>42956961 #>>42956964 #>>42957605 #>>42957866 #>>42958342 #>>42958365 #>>42959482 #>>42959947 #>>42960118 #>>42960167 #>>42960565 #>>42960840 #>>42965103 #>>42965157 #>>42965320 #>>42966271 #>>42967557 #>>42968099 #>>42968645 #
ge96 ◴[] No.42951934[source]
I quit reddit too recently, I still look at it for info but I'm not logged in/scrolling through it

I find myself reaching for something when I have YouTube/chilling at my desk at the end of the day, can't code anymore/make something just on till I sleep. Sometimes have the desire to play a video game (I have a gaming rig too funny how that works)

I've been trying to read HN or IEEE, TechCrunch stuff like that as my "lazy fun"

I will miss posting stuff like "what is this car" or being part of the car talk for a sporty car I drive but idk kind of want to just live too

It's unfortunate people expect you to have social media like a girl asks me if I have Instagram and I'm weird to not have one, I get it they can scope you out too for safety but when I tried using that stuff I felt this pressure to post about something

Anyway my main goal in life right now is getting out of debt/staying fit and work on projects

replies(11): >>42952309 #>>42952617 #>>42952690 #>>42952816 #>>42953624 #>>42953643 #>>42953946 #>>42954364 #>>42956528 #>>42956977 #>>42965346 #
1. niceice ◴[] No.42953624[source]
I checked reddit recently for the first time in a while, and I was shocked by how radicalized its become. An echo chamber of hateful people and perhaps GPTs that are agitating the big subreddits. The contrast is stark with all the "no place for hate" in the rules and endless banning of microaggressions.

I saw dozens of death threats. Even an explicit death threat thread with over 40,000 upvotes before reddit stepped in and shut the whole subreddit down.

It reminded me of Ghostbusters 2 with all the aggressively angry people and the ooze pouring out of the sewers, all building upon itself.

replies(9): >>42953859 #>>42954366 #>>42954686 #>>42954831 #>>42955797 #>>42955864 #>>42956330 #>>42959346 #>>42967763 #
2. gosub100 ◴[] No.42953859[source]
Agreed. There is exactly one way to think and believe on Reddit. The "outrage" might be tolerable or even informative in some cases if it was equally distributed.

It's disheartening when the one-track politics infects every square inch. It's a good point about bots because 1) they can be sold or rented to advertisers, 2) they are more valuable with higher karma, and 3) the easiest way to get a bot to harvest karma is by agreeing with the hive. So they're amplifying "the message" without even intending to.

3. input_sh ◴[] No.42954366[source]
That particular subreddit isn't shut down, it was temporarily suspended as the moderators simply got overwhelmed. There's no indication of bad faith from either the mod team nor the reddit admins, the floodgate was just too much for them to handle. It pretty much says so in the ban message, admins are gonna help them take back control and it will be up within a couple of days.
replies(1): >>42958613 #
4. nonchalantsui ◴[] No.42954686[source]
This is just the consequence of the API protests. Despite people claiming it had no lasting impact, admins coming in and making sweeping changes to mod teams replacing them with loyalists, alongside ramping up centralized feeds to serve more ads onto meant content quality took a nosedive. This is obvious in most subs if you actually look at who is submitting the threads (something the app and All/Popular pages hides in several views), most of these subs are dominated by a handful of accounts. It's a cycle too, because often they'll continue spamming subs in order to get on All/Popular, or make up weird stories to do so, effectively karma farming taken very seriously, with mods encouraging it because of the aforementioned loyalists.

It's all just driveby anger and reposts. Maybe some smaller subs with good communities here and there, but that often requires a mod team putting in substantial hours and remaining under the radar from All/Popular in any shape.

Forgot to mention, Reddit also started paying these accounts for posting. So a literal financial incentive to ragebait. It' called the "Contributor Program".

replies(3): >>42958339 #>>42961168 #>>42962269 #
5. godshatter ◴[] No.42954831[source]
I just stick to the niche subreddits (games, interests, whatever). The main subreddits have been especially aggressive echo chambers for a long time now.
replies(1): >>42964494 #
6. taurknaut ◴[] No.42955797[source]
/r/worldnews is one of the most astroturfed places on the internet. Some of those commenters are so nationalist and bloodthirsty they unnerve me. The ban hammer is extremely active on this sub, and for saying completely innocuous political statements about personal preference. I'm absolutely sure this is broader than just that sub but I've probably heard this specific complaint from probably a dozen other people too.

I will say, the subreddit system does a decent job of quarantining the dysfunction to that sub. The mod quality is everything and the mod drama is an absolute dumpster fire. (Extremely curiously, Ghislaine Maxwell seems to have been one of the most prolific of the mods, and one of her suspected accounts may be one of the most successful (karma-wise) posters of all reddit.) But on the flipside, /r/askhistorians is still one of the best resources on the internet. Many of the specialty subreddits I frequent (Aviation, UkraineRussiaReport, video game subs, several miscellaneous african subs) are still functioning fine.

replies(1): >>42957440 #
7. urda ◴[] No.42955864[source]
Reddit, by far, is one of the worst echo chambers on the internet. I've seen hundreds of death threats at one political group on there, but if any veiled threat is made against the "reddit approved party" it is instantly removed or accounts suspended. This really peaked during 2020, when open calls for violence stayed up, some with reddit admin approvals.

It used to be a good site, but that was many years ago.

replies(2): >>42957460 #>>42965393 #
8. Aurornis ◴[] No.42956330[source]
> I checked reddit recently for the first time in a while, and I was shocked by how radicalized its become.

Reddit has always had these elements, but they were previously isolated to certain subreddits.

I noticed the biggest change when the app and website became aggressive about getting people to join other subreddits and inserting posts from other subreddits into people's feeds. Suddenly the isolated subreddits I followed were full of low effort content and angry comments.

Reddit's front page is shockingly bad. The amount of misinformation and ragebait that gets upvoted to the front page is almost hard to believe.

It's also interesting that many subreddits have embraced the ragebait. Subreddits like /r/AITA have been clear about how they don't care if stories are real or not, but legions of Redditors engage with obvious ChatGPT spam as if it was a real situation they need to weigh in on.

9. intended ◴[] No.42957460[source]
Did people forget the_donald?

What do people think others will do, when they see that the_donald behavior gets rewarded by electoral and political support?

If its not clear, everyone is going to radicalize, because its getting success.

replies(3): >>42958373 #>>42958402 #>>42964864 #
10. taurknaut ◴[] No.42957612{3}[source]
The concern is understandable, I suppose. It's just a convenient way to see clips from both sides of the conflict, and it's the best source for combat footage clips anywhere. I do have a working brain and can use it to identify when people have a polemic. I prefer it to telegram, which is the alternative. The comments are indeed... uh, very strident in their support for either side. So I'm not sure if it's "propaganda" so much as people regurgitating propaganda at each other at full volume.

Anyway, it's a war. Propaganda is essentially impossible to avoid without ignoring the topic entirely. Still, it's what we have to work with. And to be clear my sympathies lie with the ukrainian people.

replies(1): >>42957872 #
11. _DeadFred_ ◴[] No.42957872{4}[source]
Propaganda is big on mixing just enough 'both sides' to lend legitimacy. Again, if I'm remembering correctly this dude was called out on another sub and ended up creating this one specifically to continue his propaganda narrative. There's a lot better subs to work with on Reddit than that sub
replies(1): >>42957982 #
12. hackinthebochs ◴[] No.42957982{5}[source]
/r/UkraineRussiaReport is basically the only forum on the whole site where anything that isn't 100% cheerleading for Ukraine is allowed to be posted. It seems like pro-Russian propaganda only in contrast to the rest of Reddit where the pro-Ukraine bias is actively enforced by the mods. You say the creator was "called out" on other subs which is why he created the alternative. But that just lends legitimacy to the sub, if you're interested in anything approaching an unbiased source of information.
replies(1): >>42965674 #
13. theoreticalmal ◴[] No.42958056{3}[source]
In a HN thread about loyalist mods and echo chamber subreddits, what does claiming an account was “called out” actually mean?
14. eloisius ◴[] No.42958339[source]
RDDT was a good buy, but the site is absolutely going to be destroyed. That’s what’s valuable. I’m not selling until Reddit is Facebook-tier garbage.
15. medellin ◴[] No.42958373{3}[source]
Likely take a break from social media and talk with some real people. Lots of people voted for trump aren’t radical actually none that i know are. I come from a small town in a red state and yes they completely disagree with democrats on pretty much everything but the stuff you read on reddit is so far fetched and extreme I don’t know how anyone would take it seriously.

They believe people hate Americans and everyone should be ashamed traveling overseas. As someone who travels all the time to multiple continents not just Europe i have never encountered anyone who asked or even cared. Most people don’t live in a political bubble where they need to stop being friends with people over politics.

Anyway a lot people are choosing to live in an angry little bubble. It is really sad to see.

replies(5): >>42958971 #>>42959308 #>>42960546 #>>42961264 #>>42964927 #
16. niceice ◴[] No.42958613[source]
To be even more precise, here's the message from the source;

> This community has been banned

> This subreddit has been temporarily banned due to a prevalence of violent content. Inciting and glorifying violence or doxing are against Reddit’s platform-wide Rules. It will reopen in 72 hours, during which Reddit will support moderators and provide resources to keep Reddit a healthy place for discussion and debate.

17. Terr_ ◴[] No.42959308{4}[source]
> Lots of people voted for trump aren’t radical actually none that i know are.

The same can be said for the supporters of many radical and terrible historical regimes. I'm not radical, I'm simply pushing this radical boulder along, and I can stop it whenever I wan tooo-oops."

replies(1): >>42960085 #
18. DaiPlusPlus ◴[] No.42959346[source]
> The contrast is stark with all the "no place for hate" in the rules and endless banning of microaggressions.

Please be specific.

19. lmm ◴[] No.42959448{3}[source]
> Wasn't it formed when the mod got called out in a different sub?

Most subreddits gets formed by someone who's tired of the existing subs, gets into one too many arguments with a mod, and thinks they can do better. I don't know anything about these specific subs but I wouldn't see "this guy formed this sub after getting called out by a mod in another sub" as any kind of red flag.

20. deathanatos ◴[] No.42959601{4}[source]
> Subreddits like r/pics are packed full of thinly veiled death threats towards the sitting president or Elon Musk.

This is just blatant misinformation. Since r/pics is the only example you've chosen to give us, let's evaluate it: I've scrolled through the current first 50 posts in Hot, and 0 of them are death threats, thinly veiled or otherwise. "Packed full", indeed.

And here, so it isn't simply my word vs. his; these are the current posts:

  Protest, "Musk Stole Your Tax Data"
  Picture of Nazi being punched after making a Nazi salute
  Protest, "The Whole World is Watching"
  Painting over values at the FBI
  McConnell in a wheelchair
  Flag upside down outside State Dept.
  Kid covering ears with politician in foreground
  "Buy Canadian Instead" sign in CA store
  Protest, no visible message, flag with corp logos instead of stars
  German anti-fascism protest
  UFC fight match post KO [KO'd opponent is a neo-Nazi]
  US Marine holding flag in distress position
  Protestor, "No kings in America", dressed as Cap. America, mouth taped over
  Protest "Nobody voted for Elon"
  Protest "Stop Musk's Takeover"
  Picture of Trudeau
  Protest "Smells like Fascism"
… none of which are death threats. I could scroll all night and not see any examples.
replies(5): >>42959752 #>>42959762 #>>42959812 #>>42960142 #>>42963822 #
21. throwawaythekey ◴[] No.42959752{5}[source]
Yeah "packed full" is probably a bit too heavy here. To pick a few examples though:

- The nazi punching thread had several moderated comments ranked near the top which were presumably calls to violence.

- The Mitch McConnal thread has many people looking forward to his death, hoping he goes to hell, and a few deleted comments.

- A musk thread has "eat the rich" and storm the capitol. Not super highly ranked.

I didn't go through all of them but it certainly is a bit odious.

Also note though how there's only 1 non political thread and the remainder are anti trump. This is on a general interest sub and what is likely to be an unremarkable day in the administration!

replies(5): >>42960019 #>>42960753 #>>42961209 #>>42963570 #>>42964965 #
22. lodovic ◴[] No.42959812{5}[source]
You're missing the point. The real issue is that r/pics, a subreddit that should be about photography enthusiasm, has become so hyperfocused on politics, that it only features posts that are critical of Musk and Trump. As is evident from the list of active topics you posted.
replies(2): >>42960248 #>>42966717 #
23. Dalewyn ◴[] No.42959901{6}[source]
It feels like everyone forgot Reddit's roots as far as its politics are concerned. Namely, the place was Libertarian Central on the internet until 2015 when it got astroturfed basically overnight to swing the other way. I was there to witness it and the whiplash was something fierce.

Reddit has been basically unusable for anything concerning politics since, and nowadays with politics leaking out into every damn sub possible it definitely has a problem.

replies(3): >>42960275 #>>42960876 #>>42964382 #
24. intended ◴[] No.42960019{6}[source]
That helped the issue click into place - NONE of the past 15 days are unremarkable. And again, ITS BEEN 15 Days!

If you stop your thought at just “people are losing their shit”, thats seeing half the world.

I’d say thats disingenuous, because it misses or dismisses the incredibly alarming actions that have precipitated them.

If you genuinely care about it, then you might be interested in knowing why people are responding like this. For example, people generally hate Nazis, and punching Nazis is a popular idea.

DO people expect themselves to be polite when the see a takeover and destruction of their government? “it looks like pre WW2 Germany out there, do pass the salt dear.”

replies(3): >>42960178 #>>42960264 #>>42960285 #
25. intended ◴[] No.42960036{6}[source]
Reddit? Or the circumstances of Trump’s presidency?

Hacker News is radicalizing, and is very likely going to have to decide if it’s going to be pro MAGA or not.

What did people think the response was going to be once Trump did everything he said he would? People would lie back and let things happen?

In America? The land of the second amendment? I mean people should be happy, after this liberals are going to be proud members of the NRA.

replies(3): >>42960433 #>>42963607 #>>43043319 #
26. caminante ◴[] No.42960142{5}[source]
Only skimming the headlines is dishonest. Read the actual threads.
27. nobodywillobsrv ◴[] No.42960180{4}[source]
Exactly. The "outrage" class have a huge problem with reality.
28. oneeyedpigeon ◴[] No.42960248{6}[source]
Is r/pics explicitly apolitical? Does it tend to feature current events and is that lineup just proportional to the magnitude of what's happening right now?
replies(1): >>42966746 #
29. throwawaythekey ◴[] No.42960264{7}[source]
Let me put it another way. Trump is likely to try many outrageous and unexpected things.

As someone who tries to be non partisan, and isn't even american, I am fatigued by all of the claims that the world within the USA is ending. Whenever I take the time to examine any of the claims they tend to be fairly hollow or making slippery slope arguments.

As an international user of reddit, there are many of us I presume, I want the outrage to be saved for Trumps undeniable and worst offenses. In my eyes the memecoin was worse than anything which has happened since he became president and yet it has completely left the collective focus. Everything since then has just been a mix of people allowing trump to dictate the media cycle and the deep state deploying its immune system.

replies(2): >>42960738 #>>42960916 #
30. throwawaythekey ◴[] No.42960275{7}[source]
It's a shame it's become hard to make free speech arguments on reddit. RIP Aaron Swartz.
31. WickyNilliams ◴[] No.42960546{4}[source]
You realise this works both ways? The average left leaning person doesn't have 700 pronouns and isn't calling for a communist revolution. They're not paid by Soros. They don't have blue hair and have a meltdown at the slightest upset.

The online charicatures are just that. In both directions.

Real talk though: the US, via the current administration, is trashing its international reputation. With tariffs and lashing out at (former?) allies. Or with Musk demanding regime change in the UK, for instance. On a personal level people will still be chill no doubt, but you should be prepared for some negative attitudes towards the US if things continue unabated.

32. Terr_ ◴[] No.42960564{6}[source]
> stereotype [...] innuendo [...] slippery slope

No need for histrionics, it's simple: Someone doesn't need to actively desire a terrible outcome to be morally culpable of making bad choices, ones they should-have-known would enable or encourage it to happen. Multiple such people can and do form groups.

It's not limited to politics either, which is how we get idioms like "playing with fire."

replies(3): >>42960994 #>>42961121 #>>42965365 #
33. macNchz ◴[] No.42960738{8}[source]
> slippery slope arguments

If we review democracies through history that have at some point become less democratic, I think describing the process of how that actually happens as being a slippery slope is quite apt. I’d say it’s more of a fallacy to assume that democracy is a secure default state of being rather than an ideal that we must collectively support or lose entirely—that we can safely “slip” a little without risking a slide further down the slope.

replies(2): >>42961610 #>>42970033 #
34. anamdhek ◴[] No.42960753{6}[source]
I’m a researcher working at a supposedly prestigious university and I can see homeless people with rotting limbs if I step off my campus and don’t look the other way. Some of my colleagues recently were awarded significant private funds to push a compound for a currently incurable dementia to clinical trials. They attended an instructional conference with other awardees and found that several were not there because they are at the NIH and so are under a gag order and travel ban. I am pretty sure Mitch “McConnal,” who spent his career obstructing any progress on the issues I describe below and who paved the way for current events, is actually dying of either a related dementia or the one they are working on, btw. So, what do you recommend Americans do? Never reveal we might have some anger towards being at the whims of people who would rather die themselves than help others? Don’t get me started on the genius who invented the single-person subway or et al.

You are misattributing American madness to the people it is being inflicted on rather than the instigators. We have oil wells behind our homes and schools and the white picket fence chemists I knew and looked up to as a kid are the reason we all have PFAs in our blood. Our president vacillates between saber-rattling at our closest allies, starting a new war in the Middle East, and causing constitutional crises every other day. We don’t have a single-payer healthcare option like every other developed country and our “social safety nets” are so impacted and difficult to get, they might as well not exist for most people. We do, however, have some very, very profitable oligopolies (some which make very tasty fish sandwiches) and higher income inequality than India or Russia.

35. eecc ◴[] No.42960797{8}[source]
:D you forgot the /s
36. TFYS ◴[] No.42960799{8}[source]
> deported a few thousand illegal immigrants who are criminals and rapists

As well as thousands who are normal hard-working people.

> taken back Panama Canal from Chinese dictatorship

By using threats of force like a dictatorship.

> attempted to shrink the size of the government and American tax burden

In illegal, non-democratic ways.

> put more tariffs on Chinese dictatorship

As well as more democratic allies.

> focused US on AI

Without understanding the huge risks involved for all of humanity.

> taken over Gaza to prevent another war between Israel and Hamas

By doing ethnic cleansing.

> gotten Mexico and Canada to finally own up to protecting the border

And in the process lost the trust and respect of allies.

replies(1): >>42961076 #
37. foldr ◴[] No.42960876{7}[source]
It’s not a Reddit thing. I also remember the days when everyone online was a libertarian. But Conservatives then turned to nationalist ideologies that don’t emphasize the free market, that are anti-immigration, and that take a dim view of personal sexual freedom. There are fewer people expressing libertarian points of view all over the shop. There’s a good article about it here: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/06/05/the-individual...
replies(2): >>42961342 #>>42964376 #
38. lazide ◴[] No.42960916{8}[source]
And firing most of the national security council, and all the FBI agents who went after folks who did Jan 6th?
replies(1): >>42968372 #
39. foldr ◴[] No.42960931{8}[source]
> Off the bat, you've called everyone that disagrees with you a Nazi that needs to be violently attacked.

They did not do this. Everyone can read the post that you’re responding to.

40. lazide ◴[] No.42960994{7}[source]
Notably, people will also be nearly universally angry at anyone who points out the inevitable consequences of their actions in cases like this. Especially if they know you’re right.

Near as I can tell, the biggest failure of the left (and one that keeps getting repeated) is thinking words/knowledge matter in situations like this.

41. arkey ◴[] No.42961076{9}[source]
> As well as thousands who are normal hard-working people.

Do you have sources for that? Honestly trying to find out. Thanks!

replies(1): >>42961955 #
42. safety1st ◴[] No.42961168[source]
It's wild how bad it has gotten since the election. It's important to remember that free speech does not protect directly inciting violence and it does not protect advocating for the murder of anyone, even a politician. These are generally illegal

So what Reddit has morphed into, is an illegal content factory - there has already been a comment or two about it from the government and the Trump admin is not one that is likely to sit on my sidelines over this.

Whatever your politics may be, I'm just saying this is going to burn Reddit bad.

replies(3): >>42965045 #>>42965085 #>>42997038 #
43. intended ◴[] No.42961264{4}[source]
Hey, this is a PSA: this was going to happen.

I’ve seen this sequence of events play out before.

In many was ‘go outside’ is dismissive of what many people feel is happening, that to within 15 days of this new presidency. This is a low key way of saying you don’t like people protesting.

While at the same time others are saying people aren’t protesting enough.

If you aren’t ok with all of this, I strongly suggest deleting all social media, including hacker news. Take your advice and go outside. Be good to your neighbors and your mental health.

There is zero space for passive consumption when one of the biggest cultural and economic forces in English speaking Internet land is dismantling itself.

There is going to be very little space for any tolerance of nuance - because Trump is going to continue to escalate. He is going to follow a plan which was known, and it aims at gutting the US, and justifying it with DEI or whatever the cassus belli of the month is.

This is eventually going to result in ‘riots.’

Which will feed the righteousness of the conservatives, which will result in a new round of “well you were so happy when the year started, where are you now.”

It will escalate into attacks on democrats as the devil. And HN will swing from left outrage to right outrage.

At that time the roles will be reversed, and the positions will switch.

Again - If you or anyone reading these comments is tired on Feb 6th - leave the internet right now. This is your tornado / natural disaster warning.

This isn’t meant to be hurtful to you, or to be any defense of anything.

I always assume I am wrong, and I hope I can look back at these comments with embarrassment over what looks like histrionics.

The problem I have is that i deal with social media and online safety as work and as research. Papers on this topic are my fun reading when my brain isn’t fogged up.

This is going to be worse than brexit. And that’s if we are all lucky.

I was asking bankers if there’s any slack in the financial system in November - and I asked this in multiple countries.

The answer was no. So when the trade shocks start hitting the system, expect a downturn.

This is aside from the walking dead syndrome which america will face after gutting multiple systems in-flight.

I wish you luck and the very best. Sorry.

44. Terr_ ◴[] No.42961300{8}[source]
> you want to stereotype [...] innuendo [...] slippery slope [...] you're pre-convincing [...] thought crimes

You're the one who's been making all the personal condemnations of evil intent, stop with the psychological projection.

replies(1): >>42962768 #
45. marxisttemp ◴[] No.42961364{6}[source]
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
replies(1): >>42961485 #
46. ◴[] No.42961485{7}[source]
47. derangedHorse ◴[] No.42961610{9}[source]
The reason why a slippery slope is a fallacy is that the starting point is an arbitrary threshold. Nothing here indicates the end of democracy to me. To someone looking to find some indication, anything can look like the beginning of the end.
replies(2): >>42962989 #>>42964000 #
48. matwood ◴[] No.42961904{6}[source]
I think it's ironic that people are up in arms about random posts on Reddit while many of those same people cheer at pardoning those who attacked the capital and brought actual violence on police officers. Will people letting off steam on Reddit lead to a violent insurrection?

The temperature is so high right now, and it's only continuing to rise because there seems to be zero accountability for what's happening whether it's pardons or Musk running unfettered through government accounts. Unfortunately, it's natural for people to keep escalating when they see no other avenue.

49. matwood ◴[] No.42961955{10}[source]
The only way to round up the numbers Trump wants to round up at this point is by going to job sites. You may think differently, but I don't think criminal gang members are typically working construction, in meat packing plants or picking crops. They are busy doing...you know, criminal things.

Also, Biden has already addressed the numbers coming across the border [1]. So again, the people who are left are mostly hard working people trying to make a life.

[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c36e41dx425o

50. foldr ◴[] No.42962080{9}[source]
Nope. I’ve just been around long enough to observe the overall shifts in political discourse that have occurred since the early 2000s.
51. NeutralCrane ◴[] No.42962269[source]
This behavior has been going on long before the API protests.
52. caminante ◴[] No.42962768{9}[source]
OK. Why did you dismiss the claim above that "some but not all" aren't radical?
53. macNchz ◴[] No.42962989{10}[source]
Many of the circumstances being called out as concerning in recent weeks map well to historical examples—the framing of the argument alone doesn’t inherently invalidate it when we have good examples of comparable events (e.g. purge and installation of unqualified loyalists) precipitating critical, difficult to recover from outcomes (democratic backsliding) in other societies. When the stakes are so high, vigilance is rational.
replies(1): >>42964130 #
54. ◴[] No.42963423{7}[source]
55. myko ◴[] No.42963570{6}[source]
Do you also consider Musk's nazism odious?

There is a reason people are angry and the truth is Musk/trump have gone too far. It's bizarre to say but we are watching the downfall of the USA in real time. The country has been captured by criminals who are working to destroy it–folks are going to be angry about that.

replies(1): >>42964998 #
56. myko ◴[] No.42963607{7}[source]
> after this liberals are going to be proud members of the NRA.

I grew up an active NRA member, shooting since I was 6. I have long since disassociated myself with the group but want to make it clear - a lot of liberals have guns and regularly practice using them.

We don't need the NRA (a Putin funded organization) to do that!

57. jandrese ◴[] No.42963822{5}[source]
There is a certain point where the calls for calmness come across as "stop making noise about the coup in progress". People should be calling out the people blatantly breaking the law and undermining the foundations of society.
58. buttercraft ◴[] No.42964000{10}[source]
Well, if you wait until that threshold is crossed, it's already too late!
59. caminante ◴[] No.42964130{11}[source]
> Many of the circumstances being called out as concerning in recent weeks map well to historical examples

They also map to historical counter-examples.

You don't have to go far. Take hysterical false positives like #RussiaGate, which turned out to be a manufactured hoax.

60. fwip ◴[] No.42964376{8}[source]
I used to be a libertarian too, when I was 17 years old and I thought I was the smartest person in the room.

Then I realized that my kindergarten teacher was onto something when she told us we should be nice and share our toys, and I grew up.

replies(1): >>42966725 #
61. fwip ◴[] No.42964382{7}[source]
Astroturfed by whom?
62. ◴[] No.42964484{6}[source]
63. dogprez ◴[] No.42964494[source]
I tried that with work. I created an account where I can just follow a few things related to my job. The problem is that reddit will start showing you things you didn't subscribe to. It's a battle to keep them at bay. If you look at my work account feed it's all mycology, bad tattoos, what-is-this-thing. I never subscribed to any of them. Yea, they are interesting but that's not what I wanted or need at work.
replies(1): >>42966661 #
64. rightbyte ◴[] No.42964864{3}[source]
'thedonald' was not violent are even hateful by Reddit standards. Banning it was a big mistake and gave fringe supporters headroom.

Reddit has in general got way worse since 2016. The amount of bloodthirst and hate is very unsettling.

replies(1): >>42966996 #
65. wat10000 ◴[] No.42964927{4}[source]
I was in Europe for a while starting right after 9/11 and there was a lot of shame and no lack of pointed questions. The locals didn’t hate us, but there was a decent amount of “what the hell is wrong with you guys?” It was not uncommon for American travelers to put Canadian flag pins on their backpacks to try to deflect attention or curry favor.

It’s surely ten times worse now. Trump makes W look like a statesman, and we could at least plead that W didn’t win a majority and only became president because the system is stupid.

replies(1): >>42965623 #
66. wat10000 ◴[] No.42964965{6}[source]
Merely looking forward to someone’s death is now going too far? I get why overt threats are bad, but that’s getting ridiculous. Public figures are going to get some hate and that’s within the boundaries of what should be acceptable. Are we supposed to pretend there aren’t a bunch of destructive people in power we’d like to see gone?
67. SV_BubbleTime ◴[] No.42964998{7}[source]
> Do you also consider Musk's nazism odious?

Are you for real? Is this seriously a good faith argument? My man, you may be a true believer, and that is no compliment. Course correct. Try to steelman a bit.

replies(1): >>43044228 #
68. michaelt ◴[] No.42965045{3}[source]
> It's important to remember that free speech does not protect directly inciting violence and it does not protect advocating for the murder of anyone, even a politician. These are generally illegal

Under US first amendment rights, it's actually sometimes legal.

For example, "Watts v. United States" established that if an anti-draft speaker tells a crowd "If they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is LBJ" that's political hyperbole.

So if a crowd were to set up a guillotine outside congress and chant "hang mike pence" it's not necessarily illegal.

69. noah_buddy ◴[] No.42965085{3}[source]
The only thing not covered by the concept (and law) of freedom of speech with regard to violence are direct, clear incitements to immediately commit violence. E.g. egging someone on to go lynch another person right now is not legal.

Saying “I think this person should be killed” is legally free speech.

70. adolph ◴[] No.42965365{7}[source]
> morally culpable

Whose morals? What morals?

71. nonethewiser ◴[] No.42965393[source]
It optimizes for echo chambers. You see what gets upvoted the most.
72. rightbyte ◴[] No.42965623{5}[source]
I remember the anti-US sentiment among people at the time of the invasion of Iraq as way harsher than now during Trump. Like not even close.

It seems to be mainly European neoliberals that are more upset about Trump.

replies(1): >>42967524 #
73. rightbyte ◴[] No.42965674{6}[source]
The overton window has shifted quite abit on the matter since about a year or something, though.
74. Karrot_Kream ◴[] No.42966661{3}[source]
Old Reddit still doesn't have any suggested posts. Also, the Reddit API works just fine within limit. It's unusable for scraping but as a single user it works fine.
75. deathanatos ◴[] No.42966717{6}[source]
> You're missing the point. The real issue is that r/pics, a subreddit that should be about photography enthusiasm, has become so hyperfocused on politics,

No, I'm not. I'm making a statement about a particular claim: that Reddit is overwhelmed with leftist death threats.

I said nothing about r/pics being apolitical, and I'm not taking a stance in this comment chain about whether I think r/pics should or should not be apolitical. That's a different claim, and you're moving the goalposts.

76. foldr ◴[] No.42966725{9}[source]
Libertarianism was never my thing, but I get the impression that it's not as popular with people in their teens and twenties now as it was in the 2000s.
77. deathanatos ◴[] No.42966746{7}[source]
> Is r/pics explicitly apolitical?

No, as evidenced by the "Politics" flair. (But also no, the rules of the sub do not forbid political images.)

> Does it tend to feature current events and is that lineup just proportional to the magnitude of what's happening right now?

Yep.

78. 9283409232 ◴[] No.42966996{4}[source]
the_donald was very hateful but I wouldn't call them violent. They were a cultish meme sub like /r/Conservative is. They got banned was for brigading not for being violent and hateful.
replies(1): >>42970447 #
79. brewdad ◴[] No.42967524{6}[source]
I think it's more that there is nothing to be gained about asking an American in Europe about Trump. Most likely, they think he's a douchenozzle too so why bring him up and ruin a vacationer's day. On the off chance they are a Trump supporter, now the European has to listen to an idiot spout Newsmax nonsense until they can get away.
80. SV_BubbleTime ◴[] No.42968372{9}[source]
What branch of government do they work for? Because if it is the executive... Go ahead and find something else to stomp your feet about.
81. throwawaythekey ◴[] No.42970013{7}[source]
Calls to violence have no place in a civil society. Perhaps as a response to real, physical, violence it would be ok.

I also had trouble with all the far right wingers who kept talking about civil war.

replies(1): >>42991537 #
82. throwawaythekey ◴[] No.42970033{9}[source]
Personally I enjoy slippery slope arguments which is why I didn't use the term fallacy. What I dislike is the reddit framing of having already slipped!
83. rightbyte ◴[] No.42970447{5}[source]
I would go as far as to say it was a childish meme sub (edit: and cultish, ye). I wonder if it was like that Flat Earth Society started. Once the "Qanon" type of guys turn up the memes become dogma.

I might have a different threshold for hateful on the internets or I didn't look closely enough.

84. Juliate ◴[] No.42991537{8}[source]
A nazi feeling empowered enough to open up and state his ideas is in itself a call to violence.

Or you didn't experience, or don't know what they are, what they think and what they want ; neither the aftermath.

85. solumunus ◴[] No.42997038{3}[source]
I don’t know if you’ve noticed but respect of law and norms is being thrown out of the window. That was the old USA and the paradigm is wildly shifting.
86. Geezus_42 ◴[] No.43043319{7}[source]
Well Trump is leaning into the Curtis Garvin BS which is apparently quite popular with the Silicon Valley crowd.
87. myko ◴[] No.43044228{8}[source]
The nazi salute is a fact, the question is where do you draw the line. Is his nazism okay because it's a joke? Not that big a deal for other reasons? I admit it's difficult for me to steelman here because the best arguments I can come up with for him are unconvincing.

If you feel the need to defend the salute I would suggest digging into that.