←back to thread

757 points headalgorithm | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.918s | source
1. munchler ◴[] No.42953233[source]
Scientific American used to be a great magazine and should get back to what made it so valuable: Covering important ideas in science without watering them down. Their website now describes it as "the essential guide to the most awe-inspiring advances in science and technology". Blech.
replies(1): >>42956222 #
2. fritzo ◴[] No.42956222[source]
Have you tried Science News? I currently read neither, but at one point I switched from the fluffy Scientific American to the no-nonsense Science News.
replies(1): >>42956426 #
3. munchler ◴[] No.42956426[source]
Thank you for the suggestion. I will give it a try.