←back to thread

641 points shortformblog | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.422s | source
Show context
giancarlostoro ◴[] No.42951399[source]
Anything from before the 1980s should just be on YouTube, its easy cash for them on films that are sitting idle otherwise. Anything they aren't licensing to anyone anywhere should just be on YouTube. Or any sort of streaming platform that has sane ads, and anyone can see. It is really sad to me there's no genuine YouTube competitor.
replies(3): >>42952692 #>>42952896 #>>42960112 #
bongodongobob ◴[] No.42952692[source]
"you should just do X" generally means you don't have the full picture. You're completely disregarding all the union stuff that needs to be considered. You're forgetting all the little guys that make movies happen. Yeah the directors and actors probably don't care, but the other 100s of other people involved in making films probably do.

Edit: You're right. Just disregard any laws and contracts in place. HN knows best. It must be that easy.

replies(3): >>42952952 #>>42953008 #>>42956225 #
t-writescode ◴[] No.42952952[source]
Early US copyright was something like 20 years + 20 years if they were still alive.

Under that, everything before 1985 would be free of copyright already.

I think the majority of Americans would greatly prefer that model; but, The Mouse had other plans and has extended copyright to approx 100 years.

replies(1): >>42953173 #
1. bongodongobob ◴[] No.42953173[source]
I'm not saying that shouldn't change. But you're right! Just change copyright law! Easy. Brilliant.
replies(1): >>42956120 #
2. greiskul ◴[] No.42956120[source]
Apparently it was super easy to change copyright law to extend it over and over again.