←back to thread

757 points headalgorithm | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
karaterobot ◴[] No.42949929[source]
Avoid following the news constantly. Check in every once in a while—a couple times a week at most. Get your news from long articles, not tweets. Actually read the articles, don't just learn about the world from hot takes.

> ... people have found that, actually, outrage can be useful. It actually can help you identify a problem and react to it. But it can also be harmful if you’re experiencing it all the time and become overwhelmed by it.

I'm reading that as meaning something more like identify a problem and act on it. Outrage itself is a reaction, just not a positive one. There's no shortage of people reacting to things.

replies(9): >>42950086 #>>42950624 #>>42951057 #>>42954204 #>>42955710 #>>42956681 #>>42957297 #>>42958168 #>>42960906 #
ryandrake ◴[] No.42950624[source]
> Actually read the articles, don't just learn about the world from hot takes.

Or, even more difficult: Actually read the science paper, or the court ruling, or the executive order, or the proposed legislation, rather than the journalist's hot take. A lot of these journalists takes boil down to "tweets with more words."

replies(1): >>42952682 #
1. nosioptar ◴[] No.42952682[source]
Another bonus is that you get accurate into that way. I've lost count of how many times the tweet/article gets it completely wrong.