←back to thread

The FAA’s Hiring Scandal

(www.tracingwoodgrains.com)
739 points firebaze | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
wand3r ◴[] No.42944621[source]
> I know, I know. The evidence is unambiguous that the bar was lowered, deliberately, over many years and with direct knowledge. The evidence is unambiguous that a cheating scandal occurred. The whole thing is as explosive as any I’ve seen, and it touches on a lot of long-running frustrations.

This is likely the most common complaint about DEI, it provides grounds for race based discrimination and lowers the bar. I am sure this was not the only government agency that did something like this and it will really hurt the Democrats chances of success for the future. Their core messaging has really boiled down to "black and brown people, women and LGBTQ are our constituency" and predictably this has turned a lot of people off the party. Especially since they haven't really delivered much even for these groups.

replies(5): >>42944818 #>>42944883 #>>42949009 #>>42949397 #>>42952825 #
itronitron ◴[] No.42949397[source]
It's a myth that the bar is lowered for DEI hires.
replies(6): >>42949700 #>>42949739 #>>42949831 #>>42950067 #>>42950197 #>>42952230 #
kikokikokiko[dead post] ◴[] No.42949831[source]
[flagged]
ryandrake ◴[] No.42950298[source]
Why are you (and many others) just assuming the black candidate is less qualified?
replies(1): >>42950692 #
d1str0 ◴[] No.42950692[source]
That’s literally what this whole article was about. Removing a high correlation performance test, that black candidates didn’t pass as frequently, and replacing it with a very low correlation questionnaire that provided a more diverse applicant pool while weeding out highly qualified individuals.
replies(3): >>42952292 #>>42952366 #>>42953023 #
1. squigz ◴[] No.42952366[source]
Was it replaced, or was the questionnaire an addition?