←back to thread

Eggs US – Price – Chart

(tradingeconomics.com)
643 points throwaway5752 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
slothtrop[dead post] ◴[] No.42951197[source]
[flagged]
hypeatei ◴[] No.42951303[source]
No, the snark is because it was a huge campaign item which didn't make any sense because:

1) The president doesn't have a magic dial to bring down prices, and

2) Trump loves tariffs which have inflationary effects no matter how you spin it

So all the complaints about high prices was just for show since they don't actually care.

EDIT: 3) Inflation was a global phenomenon and the U.S. was actually outperforming most countries in bringing the rate of inflation down.

replies(2): >>42951393 #>>42953810 #
slothtrop ◴[] No.42951393[source]
Trump's platform was bad, that does not make it reasonable to trivialize cost of living.

Notwithstanding that Biden was punished for inflationary spending, all Trump had to do was lean on the perception that people "had it better" in his term. You don't need to lower prices if your wages go up, and notwithstanding that this lags, the perception has been that wages have not kept up. Obviously the intuition was that electing Trump would lead to better outcomes, not some nefarious hidden motivation behind every voter.

> So all the complaints about high prices was just for show since they don't actually care.

That is not what it shows. All it telegraphs is that expectations are distorted. The polls were clear that inflation was the #1 motivating factor.

Black, hispanic, and Asian voters all shifted right. Harris did ok with whites. Is that because those voters do not care about prices? Is that because you think those people of color are stupid? Be serious.

replies(1): >>42951562 #
1. hypeatei ◴[] No.42951562[source]
Voters getting rid of the incumbent because of a perceived wrong does not discredit any of what I said. This happened internationally as well: incumbents lost. The rate of inflation and economy were doing quite well, with wages being higher than ever before[0].

No one is saying these people can't complain about high prices, but that we can't lie to ourselves about the solution. It was obvious to many that Trump would not fix this on day one and possibly make it worse. Now we're seeing the start of a potential trade war.

0: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/americans-wages-are...

replies(1): >>42951646 #
2. slothtrop ◴[] No.42951646[source]
> Voters getting rid of the incumbent because of a perceived wrong does not discredit any of what I said.

Most of it had no bearing on my point in the first place, but your claim that voters "didn't actually care" was refuted and you haven't offered a credible reason to believe it.

> It was obvious to many

Not to Trump's voters.

replies(1): >>42951789 #
3. hypeatei ◴[] No.42951789[source]
The "didn't actually care" was because, in light of all the memeing and facts, not to mention Trump's history with tariffs, they still voted for him. That would indicate to me that people don't invest much time in their voting choices and don't actually care. I personally think it was a nice talking point that converted some on the fence, but overall was just a vessel to further right wing/Christian fascism.