/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
Eggs US – Price – Chart
(tradingeconomics.com)
643 points
throwaway5752
| 6 comments |
05 Feb 25 16:31 UTC
|
HN request time: 0.847s
|
source
|
bottom
Show context
slothtrop
[dead post]
◴[
05 Feb 25 16:45 UTC
]
No.
42951197
[source]
▶
>>42950929 (OP)
#
[flagged]
amarcheschi
◴[
05 Feb 25 16:49 UTC
]
No.
42951287
[source]
▶
>>42951197
#
I view it more as a "the campaign was run on egg prices too, and the president isn't lowering prices"
replies(1):
>>42951322
#
1.
slothtrop
◴[
05 Feb 25 16:51 UTC
]
No.
42951322
[source]
▶
>>42951287
#
The snark predates the outcome of the election.
replies(3):
>>42951420
#
>>42951480
#
>>42951490
#
ID:
GO
2.
SketchySeaBeast
◴[
05 Feb 25 16:56 UTC
]
No.
42951420
[source]
▶
>>42951322 (TP)
#
That's because it was always a ridiculous claim and obvious he wouldn't follow through on it but people still used that as a reason to vote for him.
replies(1):
>>42951673
#
3.
jquery
◴[
05 Feb 25 16:59 UTC
]
No.
42951480
[source]
▶
>>42951322 (TP)
#
Because Trump was talking about how much he loves tariffs and obviously had no plan to reduce egg prices.
4.
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
◴[
05 Feb 25 16:59 UTC
]
No.
42951490
[source]
▶
>>42951322 (TP)
#
Please. You literally referred to "the current snark and memes about egg prices" in your original comment.
replies(1):
>>42951691
#
5.
slothtrop
◴[
05 Feb 25 17:08 UTC
]
No.
42951673
[source]
▶
>>42951420
#
It was not obvious to his voters.
6.
slothtrop
◴[
05 Feb 25 17:09 UTC
]
No.
42951691
[source]
▶
>>42951490
#
I'm referring to what I saw then.
↑