←back to thread

617 points jbegley | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.243s | source
Show context
olalonde ◴[] No.42942797[source]
That feels like PR / virtue signaling. AI has the potential to significantly reduce the human cost of war in two ways: by removing soldiers from direct combat and by enabling precision strikes which minimize collateral damage. Over time, robot-soldiers will surpass human effectiveness, making it increasingly irrational to send people into harm's way. In that world, conflicts would shift toward being decided by technological superiority - who has the better or more advanced systems - rather than by which side has more human lives to sacrifice. We could even see one day wars with no human casualties.
replies(3): >>42942825 #>>42943052 #>>42945110 #
1. megous ◴[] No.42943052[source]
Eh, we saw how AI was used during "war" for the first time. It was used to amass as many even remotely "justifiable" targets as possible, with corresponding increase in killed civilians, because humans could not keep up creating justifiable targets by other means. And at the same time it was used to justify the killings of people in more ways than one.

https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/

And Google is profiting of this, helping enforce a brutal illegal occupation.

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/google-provided-a...