←back to thread

858 points cryptophreak | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
taeric ◴[] No.42934898[source]
I'm growing to the idea that chat is a bad UI pattern, period. It is a great record of correspondence, I think. But it is a terrible UI for doing anything.

In large, I assert this is because the best way to do something is to do that thing. There can be correspondence around the thing, but the artifacts that you are building are separate things.

You could probably take this further and say that narrative is a terrible way to build things. It can be a great way to communicate them, but being a separate entity, it is not necessarily good at making any artifacts.

replies(17): >>42934997 #>>42935058 #>>42935095 #>>42935264 #>>42935288 #>>42935321 #>>42935532 #>>42935611 #>>42935699 #>>42935732 #>>42935789 #>>42935876 #>>42935938 #>>42936034 #>>42936062 #>>42936284 #>>42939864 #
1. Suppafly ◴[] No.42935699[source]
I like the idea of having a chat program, the issue is that it's horrible to have a bunch of chat programs all integrated into every application you use that are separate and incompatible with each other.

I really don't like the idea of chatting with an AI though. There are better ways to interface with AIs and the focus on chat is making people forget that.

replies(1): >>42936287 #
2. tux1968 ◴[] No.42936287[source]
We need an LSP like protocol for AI, so that we can amortize the configuration over every place we want such an integration. AISP?
replies(1): >>42936557 #
3. lytedev ◴[] No.42936557[source]
I think they're working on it? MCP: https://www.anthropic.com/news/model-context-protocol