←back to thread

927 points smallerfish | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.235s | source
Show context
portaouflop ◴[] No.42926658[source]
IMF gave them 1.4 billion to abandon the “experiment”:

> The IMF made this a condition for a loan of 1.4 billion US dollars (1.35 billion euros). In December of last year, the IMF reached an agreement with President Nayib Bukele’s government on the loan of the stated amount to strengthen the country’s “fiscal sustainability” and mitigate the “risks associated with Bitcoin,” as it was described.

—-

I dislike cryptocurrencies as much as the next guy but this was clearly something else than a failure of the currency itself

replies(30): >>42926697 #>>42926752 #>>42926769 #>>42926916 #>>42927021 #>>42927075 #>>42927122 #>>42927290 #>>42927312 #>>42927357 #>>42927505 #>>42927532 #>>42927536 #>>42927642 #>>42927745 #>>42927985 #>>42928058 #>>42928513 #>>42928720 #>>42928756 #>>42928806 #>>42929654 #>>42929949 #>>42930337 #>>42930726 #>>42930753 #>>42930779 #>>42930984 #>>42934734 #>>42935466 #
dragonwriter ◴[] No.42928058[source]
If you need to go to the IMF for a loan of ~3% of your GDP to mitigate the risks associated with Bitcoin, well, that's a pretty good sign that adopting Bitcoin as legal tender was a pretty disastrous failure.
replies(6): >>42928091 #>>42928348 #>>42928498 #>>42929002 #>>42929046 #>>42936487 #
willmadden ◴[] No.42928498[source]
What are you talking about? Their Bitcoin holdings more than doubled in value.
replies(3): >>42928631 #>>42928708 #>>42931590 #
hagbarth ◴[] No.42928708[source]
Would that not be a bad thing when using it as legal tender? Deflation tends to be disastrous for the economy.
replies(3): >>42928958 #>>42929618 #>>42931726 #
floydnoel ◴[] No.42931726[source]
deflation is fine for an economy. inflation is disastrous for an economy. the people in charge of the money printers are trying to keep you confused. don’t buy it.
replies(2): >>42931768 #>>42935113 #
1. Yizahi ◴[] No.42935113[source]
By people in change of money printer, did you mean Giancarlo Devacini, who has printed hundred billion funny tokens in some non-extradition offshore with zero audit, and used those funny tokens to buy other tokens like BTC, ETH and others? Those people? Or he is fine, because you are directly benefiting from that token printer and doesn't care about others being swindled in the process?