←back to thread

858 points cryptophreak | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
croes ◴[] No.42934439[source]
Natural language isn’t made to be precise that’s why we use a subset in programming languages.

So you either need lots of extra text to remove the ambiguity of natural language if you use AI or you need a special precise subset to communicate with AI and that’s just programming with extra steps.

replies(10): >>42934517 #>>42934537 #>>42934619 #>>42934632 #>>42934651 #>>42934686 #>>42934747 #>>42934909 #>>42935464 #>>42936139 #
oxfordmale ◴[] No.42934517[source]
Yes, let's devise a more precise way to give AI instructions. Let's call it pAIthon. This will allow powers that be, like Zuckerberg to save face and claim that AI has replaced mid-level developers and enable developers to rebrand themselves as pAIthon programmers.

Joking aside, this is likely where we will end up, just with a slightly higher programming interface, making developers more productive.

replies(1): >>42934935 #
1. dylan604 ◴[] No.42934935[source]
man, pAIthon was just sitting right there for the taking
replies(2): >>42935619 #>>42937458 #
2. ◴[] No.42935619[source]
3. oxfordmale ◴[] No.42937458[source]
Thanks for pointing it out :-)