←back to thread

927 points smallerfish | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Mengkudulangsat ◴[] No.42925325[source]
> The government, she assured, will continue buying bitcoin and having reserves in this cryptocurrency

Sounds like the term "Failed Experiment" is the writer's assertion and not the government official position.

replies(10): >>42925341 #>>42925352 #>>42925429 #>>42925453 #>>42925471 #>>42925524 #>>42926129 #>>42926578 #>>42927646 #>>42931154 #
cwillu ◴[] No.42925524[source]
“Another change makes using bitcoin entirely voluntary. (Previously, the law mandated that businesses accept bitcoin for any goods or services they provided.) Additionally, bitcoin can no longer be used to pay taxes or settle government debts.”

--https://reason.com/2025/02/03/el-salvador-walks-back-its-bit...

Sounds pretty failed to me.

replies(2): >>42925557 #>>42929279 #
desumeku ◴[] No.42925557[source]
They did this to receive a loan from the IMF. The IMF was withholding the loan because of BTC and would not disburse it until they got rid of its status as legal tender.
replies(6): >>42925576 #>>42925736 #>>42926019 #>>42926571 #>>42928110 #>>42929427 #
Mengkudulangsat ◴[] No.42925736[source]
Fair demand by the IMF.

Presumably they require their loan to be repaid in fiat because of their internal charter. If Bitcoin adoption eventually removes El Salvador's ability to issue fiat, their loan can't be repaid.

replies(5): >>42925878 #>>42925890 #>>42925948 #>>42926133 #>>42927096 #
1. xenihn ◴[] No.42925948[source]
El Salvador hasn't issued fiat since 2001. Any other presumptions as to why its a fair demand?