←back to thread

Apple is open sourcing Swift Build

(www.swift.org)
612 points dayanruben | 2 comments | 01 Feb 25 16:44 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
uhura ◴[01 Feb 25 19:07 UTC] No.42901158[source]▶
I believe that this long game of Swift being "good for everything" but "better for Apple platforms" will be detrimental to the language. This does not help the language nor seems to bring more people to the ecosystem.

Competitors seems to have a combination of: - Being more open-source - Have more contributors - Have a narrower scope

Maybe they should consider open sourcing all the tooling (like Xcode) otherwise the gap will only grow over time when compared to other languages.

replies(10): >>42901489 #>>42901515 #>>42901558 #>>42902281 #>>42902484 #>>42903459 #>>42903586 #>>42903797 #>>42905687 #>>42906498 #
kelnos ◴[01 Feb 25 21:02 UTC] No.42902281[source]▶
This feels similar to C# and Microsoft's other CLR/.NET languages. Sure, they've broken away a bit and aren't exclusively used to run things on MS platforms, but still.

And Swift is even more tied to Apple, at least to my inexperienced eye. I'm not really an Apple person (Linux, Android), even though I once really enjoyed their hardware... Swift is so far down on my list of languages to look at that I probably will never get to it.

replies(4): >>42902429 #>>42903167 #>>42905352 #>>42905806 #
liontwist ◴[02 Feb 25 03:07 UTC] No.42905352[source]▶
.net core is one of the best ways to write linux backend applications.
replies(1): >>42913010 #
1. pl4nty ◴[02 Feb 25 23:29 UTC] No.42913010{3}[source]▶
this, because msft spent years and many $$$ to build an open-source ecosystem. apple hasn't done that yet, so I'm not sure why anyone would trust them
replies(1): >>42917566 #
2. stephen_g ◴[03 Feb 25 12:36 UTC] No.42917566[source]▶
Amazing that you comment that on an announcement that is one large effort of many that Apple have been doing to build an open-source ecosystem over many years...