Most active commenters
  • dylan604(3)

←back to thread

1957 points apokryptein | 21 comments | | HN request time: 0.534s | source | bottom
1. ta988 ◴[] No.42910030[source]
Shame on all of the people working on those systems. Legit companies trying to make the world better struggle to find competent people.
replies(4): >>42910119 #>>42910131 #>>42910176 #>>42910181 #
2. dylan604 ◴[] No.42910119[source]
Ugh. Eye roll on the whole “make the world better”. So few SV products remotely make the world better. The purpose of the vast majority is to make money at all costs. I also disagree with what most people claim is making the world better. All in all, I think social media is a net negative for the world for any good that might be found. Every SV thing after that is just chasing the recketship to the moon dream.
replies(2): >>42910156 #>>42910177 #
3. quacked ◴[] No.42910131[source]
I think a big part of the ability of these shady companies pulling the brightest minds away from more clearly beneficial fields is that important flavors of ideology necessary to motivate people to take less lucrative work have been stripped from "business". There's a lot fewer appeals to art, history, cultural stewardship, or empire-building present in things like transportation, medicine, construction, etc. than there were in the past. Any flavor of "for the glory of God/the nation/the People/the Art" etc. is pretty effectively stripped out of American business, and I think that's the only kind of thing that would motivate someone who could make $250k in Adware to make $100k in something else.

People are now very well-trained to look out for their own bottom line, and take jobs accordingly.

replies(3): >>42910377 #>>42910521 #>>42914346 #
4. unification_fan ◴[] No.42910156[source]
> So few SV products remotely make the world better

Because devs have to eat in order to survive?

replies(3): >>42910174 #>>42910238 #>>42911117 #
5. 9283409232 ◴[] No.42910174{3}[source]
You don't need to work on adtech or work at Meta to survive. Don't pretend that it has nothing to do with the lavish salaries.
6. 9283409232 ◴[] No.42910176[source]
What companies?
replies(2): >>42910427 #>>42911446 #
7. RajT88 ◴[] No.42910177[source]
I believe this was parodied multiple times in season 1 of Silicon Valley.
replies(3): >>42910226 #>>42910454 #>>42910711 #
8. ◴[] No.42910181[source]
9. dylan604 ◴[] No.42910226{3}[source]
That scene in the pilot with the way over enthusiastic founder on stage with Kid Rock was pretty much when I knew I would <3 that show
10. dylan604 ◴[] No.42910238{3}[source]
Right, because SV is epitomized for the struggling dev as much as Haight Ashbury is known for struggling artists.
11. quantified ◴[] No.42910377[source]
Doing things because they increase some non-monetary value has fallen out of fashion for sure. A colleague of mine recently shared, in a group social setting, a sense of disappointment that his daughter was studying to be a doctor. I was, as far as I could tell, the only one to note that there is practical utility to having doctors.

But the "be part of our mission" was shown to be hollow over and over too. First and foremost, you as an enployee are making the investors and CEO rich. The mission is usually exploiting the employee, even when it's not exploiting the world. Employees have recognized the real social ethic (money over everything) and are just playing the same game. Which is sad.

Ideally the people who see these choices would make alternative choices that will leave their grandchildren better off in the world. It has taken only a generation for the "greed is good" mentality to drop us into this fetid soup.

replies(2): >>42910672 #>>42917782 #
12. throwaway847739 ◴[] No.42910427[source]
I have the same question. It did not seem easy for me to find a job where we are at least not writing malware (according to my judgement). But it's far from making the world better :|
13. nicbou ◴[] No.42910454{3}[source]
Direct link to the scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8C5sjjhsso
14. rolph ◴[] No.42910521[source]
i believe there are somewhat fewer practicing freemasons in those places of layte.
15. quacked ◴[] No.42910672{3}[source]
I think the phrase you called out--"be a part of our mission"--that most corporations (and, mimicking them, government agencies) regurgitate is itself the approach to socialization that causes people to feel less inclined to work for any non-profit reason. "Part of OUR mission" redefines the company as the entity to be loyal to, rather than casting the company as part of society itself. You can't replace constructs that tend to inspire people to heroism and selflessness with a corporate avatar and expect the fabric of society to remain similarly motivated. It does make a set few people a hell of a lot of money in the short term, though.
16. spencerflem ◴[] No.42910711{3}[source]
One of my favorite seasons of TV <3
17. layer8 ◴[] No.42911117{3}[source]
Ah, yes, the profession that most struggles to make ends meet.
18. yread ◴[] No.42911446[source]
I work in cancer research. Some companies are there just for greed as well but at least the end product could be helpful
19. scarface_74 ◴[] No.42914346[source]
American business has never cared about any of that stuff. It was always lip service.

Also if you haven’t heard, the US government is currently a shit show right now run by Musk as far as employment

20. ForHackernews ◴[] No.42917782{3}[source]
Aren't doctors extraordinarily well-paid? Was this outside the US?
replies(1): >>42923513 #
21. quantified ◴[] No.42923513{4}[source]
In the US. Among techies who are in the upper 10% but not the 1%