←back to thread

612 points dayanruben | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
uhura ◴[] No.42901158[source]
I believe that this long game of Swift being "good for everything" but "better for Apple platforms" will be detrimental to the language. This does not help the language nor seems to bring more people to the ecosystem.

Competitors seems to have a combination of: - Being more open-source - Have more contributors - Have a narrower scope

Maybe they should consider open sourcing all the tooling (like Xcode) otherwise the gap will only grow over time when compared to other languages.

replies(10): >>42901489 #>>42901515 #>>42901558 #>>42902281 #>>42902484 #>>42903459 #>>42903586 #>>42903797 #>>42905687 #>>42906498 #
kelnos ◴[] No.42902281[source]
This feels similar to C# and Microsoft's other CLR/.NET languages. Sure, they've broken away a bit and aren't exclusively used to run things on MS platforms, but still.

And Swift is even more tied to Apple, at least to my inexperienced eye. I'm not really an Apple person (Linux, Android), even though I once really enjoyed their hardware... Swift is so far down on my list of languages to look at that I probably will never get to it.

replies(4): >>42902429 #>>42903167 #>>42905352 #>>42905806 #
codr7 ◴[] No.42902429[source]
Sorry to hear that, I wouldn't bet anything on Apple but the core language contains a lot of good ideas imho.
replies(2): >>42902592 #>>42902660 #
nwienert ◴[] No.42902660[source]
Seems lovely but headed in a Scala-like bloated direction. The "too complex" type issues were really bad last I tried.

And one of my biggest gripes is the way you can extend things from anywhere else, easy to cause a mess.

replies(2): >>42905167 #>>42905203 #
1. codr7 ◴[] No.42905203[source]
Hm, I have to admit I have the same feeling.

But it is a shame, because many of the ideas are good imho.