←back to thread

612 points dayanruben | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
uhura ◴[] No.42901158[source]
I believe that this long game of Swift being "good for everything" but "better for Apple platforms" will be detrimental to the language. This does not help the language nor seems to bring more people to the ecosystem.

Competitors seems to have a combination of: - Being more open-source - Have more contributors - Have a narrower scope

Maybe they should consider open sourcing all the tooling (like Xcode) otherwise the gap will only grow over time when compared to other languages.

replies(10): >>42901489 #>>42901515 #>>42901558 #>>42902281 #>>42902484 #>>42903459 #>>42903586 #>>42903797 #>>42905687 #>>42906498 #
VWWHFSfQ ◴[] No.42901489[source]
I doubt Apple really cares much about competing with other languages, tooling, or platforms when it comes to Swift or Xcode. They have a completely captured audience and ecosystem, and anything beyond that isn’t even a "best effort" — it's more like, "You're welcome to see if it works for you, but don’t bother us if it doesn't."
replies(3): >>42901572 #>>42901751 #>>42902739 #
virgil_disgr4ce ◴[] No.42902739[source]
> anything beyond that isn’t even a "best effort"

Ehhh, I don't know, whoever's designing and implementing Swift and Xcode etc clearly genuinely care on a personal level about quality. I get that there's going to be taste involved but the amount of thought and effort that's gone into the ecosystem is very high.

replies(1): >>42903144 #
1. hu3 ◴[] No.42903144{3}[source]
Xcode as an example of quality? It's atrocious from my experience.

Updates tied to OS and crashes more than it should.