←back to thread

CDC data are disappearing

(www.theatlantic.com)
749 points doener | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
angelgonzales ◴[] No.42902505[source]
This is very similar to when the CDC stopped recording defensive gun use statistics! The pendulum is certainly swinging, on the other hand, I think we should retain data even if it doesn’t align with the current administration. I think it’s important that people should record data that they value, independent of governments, so they can maintain a source of truth throughout time. Articles from Axios, NYT and posts on X can change or be deleted, it’s important to take snapshots to go back and check for deltas.
replies(3): >>42902542 #>>42902598 #>>42903083 #
silverquiet ◴[] No.42902598[source]
It seems to me that all uses of guns are defensive.
replies(1): >>42902627 #
nickff ◴[] No.42902627[source]
Assassination and suicide both seem non-defensive, unless you use a very broad definition of defense.
replies(1): >>42902776 #
1. timewizard ◴[] No.42902776{3}[source]
Suicide is more common than homocide. By a factor of 2 to 1.

Murder is more common than self defense. By a factor of 10 to 1.

In all cases you are highly likely (>90%) to be on a first name basis with the person that kills you.

replies(1): >>42902875 #
2. nickff ◴[] No.42902875[source]
It should also be noted that uses of guns in self defense (e.g. “pulling a gun”) not involving any injuries or deaths are not well-tracked (though they’re estimated to be much more frequent than instances involving bodily harm).
replies(1): >>42904696 #
3. JKCalhoun ◴[] No.42904696[source]
Interesting, an unloaded or even fake gun would be just as effective in "defense" then. (And is not going to be used for either suicide or used against you.)
replies(1): >>42904758 #
4. nickff ◴[] No.42904758{3}[source]
If you are a very good actor, confident that nobody will call your bluff, and the assailant believes it is likely that the gun is real and loaded, yes.