←back to thread

161 points unsnap_biceps | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.238s | source
Show context
jonas21 ◴[] No.42894769[source]
This seems like a pretty bold and employee-friendly move. Google recently merged two large divisions, so there's going to be some redundancy. Most companies would resolve this with a layoff, but it sounds like they're trying a buyout at the request of their employees. From the article:

> Some employees at Google have recently been circulating a petition that calls for CEO Sundar Pichai to offer exactly this type of optional buyout before resorting to involuntary layoffs. “Ongoing rounds of layoffs make us feel insecure about our jobs,” the petition said, according to CNBC.

Conventional wisdom is that with voluntary buyouts, high-performing employees who have the most options will leave and lower-performing employees will stay.

We'll see how it turns out.

replies(6): >>42894834 #>>42894883 #>>42895044 #>>42895095 #>>42895826 #>>42896579 #
refulgentis ◴[] No.42894883[source]
> Google recently merged two large divisions, so there's going to be some redundancy

I don't see why - it was corporate games of thrones stuff, the hardware VP got the software VP's toys. (disclaimer: worked 7 years in P&E until I left in 2023)

replies(1): >>42894956 #
thevillagechief ◴[] No.42894956[source]
Perhaps you can help me answer a question I've had for a long time. How is that hardware VP still there? It seems to me from the outside much better fits have been pushed out, but he's still hanging on. Is he really that good that these games?
replies(3): >>42895613 #>>42897341 #>>42908405 #
1. kevingadd ◴[] No.42897341[source]
Incompetent VPs have a way of sticking around at Google and rising up into higher positions of power even if employee surveys show managers and ICs underneath have no confidence in them, at least based on the bad VPs I had to deal with while I was there (in a different org).