←back to thread

755 points MedadNewman | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.292s | source
Show context
femto ◴[] No.42892058[source]
This bypasses the overt censorship on the web interface, but it does not bypass the second, more insidious, level of censorship that is built into the model.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42825573

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42859947

Apparently the model will abandon its "Chain of Thought" (CoT) for certain topics and instead produce a canned response. This effect was the subject of the article "1,156 Questions Censored by DeepSeek", which appeared on HN a few days ago.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42858552

Edit: fix the last link

replies(10): >>42892216 #>>42892648 #>>42893789 #>>42893794 #>>42893914 #>>42894681 #>>42895397 #>>42896346 #>>42896895 #>>42903388 #
blackeyeblitzar ◴[] No.42893794[source]
I have seen a lot of people claim the censorship is only in the hosted version of DeepSeek and that running the model offline removes all censorship. But I have also seen many people claim the opposite, that there is still censorship offline. Which is it? And are people saying different things because the offline censorship is only in some models? Is there hard evidence of the offline censorship?
replies(6): >>42893887 #>>42893932 #>>42894724 #>>42894746 #>>42895087 #>>42895310 #
1. Inviz ◴[] No.42893887[source]
there's a bit of censorship locally. abliterated model makes it easy to bypass