Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

Tiananmen Square has become a litmus test for Chinese censorship, but in a way, it's revealing. The assumption is that access to this information could influence Chinese public opinion — that if people knew more, something might change. At the very least, there's a belief in that possibility.

Meanwhile, I can ask ChatGPT, "Tell me about the MOVE bombing of 1985," and get a detailed answer, yet nothing changes. Here in the US, we don’t even hold onto the hope that knowing the truth could make a difference. Unlike the Chinese, we're hopeless.

The MOVE bombing was action taken by a city police department.

And what was the result?

- A commission set up by the city, whose public results denounced the city for it's actions.

- a public apology from the mayor

- a federal lawsuit that found the city liable for excessive force and the city forced to pay millions to the victims

- a federal lawsuit forcing the city to pay millions of dollars to people who were made homeless by the events.

- another formal public apology from the city

Okay, now can you tell me what public actions the Chinese government took to atone for Tiananmen square?

> Here in the US, we don’t even hold onto the hope that knowing the truth could make a difference

How many other times after the move bombing did a city bomb out violent criminals in a densely packed neighborhood?

Your argument is just absolutely ridiculous. According to you, it seems that if you make a bad decision, it's better to try to hide that bad decision from everyone, rather than confront it and do better.

You're arguing with parent assuming that they've equated the brutality of these actions.

>According to you, it seems that if you make a bad decision, it's better to try to hide that bad decision from everyone, rather than confront it and do better.

They didn't say that at all. Consider reading their comment with more contemplative thought.

No, I am not assuming they equated the brutality. Please feel free to make a specific point instead of just saying "You read it poorly".

OP finished their post with:

> Meanwhile, I can ask ChatGPT, "Tell me about the MOVE bombing of 1985," and get a detailed answer, yet nothing changes. Here in the US, we don’t even hold onto the hope that knowing the truth could make a difference. Unlike the Chinese, we're hopeless.

Everything I wrote in my post was in reference to this point.

"yet nothing changes" -> "How many other times after the move bombing did a city bomb out violent criminals in a densely packed neighborhood?"

"we don’t even hold onto the hope that knowing the truth could make a difference" -> I listed all of the actions that went from "knowing the truth" to "making a difference". Would any of those things have happened if knowledge of the events was suppressed among the population, in the manner that Tiananmen square was?

>"yet nothing changes" -> "How many other times after the move bombing did a city bomb out violent criminals in a densely packed neighborhood?"

How many times since 1989 has the chinese communist party rolled tanks over a crowded city square during a student protest in Beijing's main square?

I can tell what you're doing here and I think I'll refuse to engage.

Have a nice weekend.