←back to thread

Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

(substack.com)
755 points MedadNewman | 1 comments | 31 Jan 25 19:41 UTC | HN request time: 0.407s | source
Show context
kelseyfrog ◴[31 Jan 25 20:28 UTC] No.42891543[source]▶
Tiananmen Square has become a litmus test for Chinese censorship, but in a way, it's revealing. The assumption is that access to this information could influence Chinese public opinion — that if people knew more, something might change. At the very least, there's a belief in that possibility.

Meanwhile, I can ask ChatGPT, "Tell me about the MOVE bombing of 1985," and get a detailed answer, yet nothing changes. Here in the US, we don’t even hold onto the hope that knowing the truth could make a difference. Unlike the Chinese, we're hopeless.

replies(15): >>42891592 #>>42891610 #>>42891615 #>>42891655 #>>42891720 #>>42891811 #>>42891830 #>>42891837 #>>42891888 #>>42891958 #>>42891971 #>>42892113 #>>42892224 #>>42892244 #>>42893394 #
1. impulsivepuppet ◴[31 Jan 25 21:22 UTC] No.42892224[source]▶
I resonate with skepticism for perhaps a different reason -- I just don't see how the censorship discussion is ever about helping China, when the whole discussion is "thinly-veiled" ritualistic anticommunism and an attention-stealing boogeyman that relativizes more pressing political issues, like a higher risk of another world war or the climate crisis. With so much tension in the air, I can't help but notice the sabre-rattling and retreat towards a reductionist description of geopolitics.