←back to thread

1041 points mertbio | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
seanc ◴[] No.42841499[source]
I've been in high tech for 30 years, and I've been laid off many times, most often from failed start ups. I _strongly_ disagree with a fully cynical response of working only to contract, leveraging job offers for raises, etc.

There are a few reasons for this, but the most concrete is that your behavior in this job has an impact on getting the next one. The author is correct that exemplary performance will not save you from being laid off, but when layoffs come your next job often comes from contacts that you built up from the current job, or jobs before. If people know you are a standout contributor then you will be hired quickly into desirable roles. If people think you are a hired gun who only does the bare minimum that next role will be harder to find.

On top of that, carrying around bitterness and cynicism is just bad for you. Pride in good work and pleasure in having an impact on customers and coworkers is good for you. Sometimes that means making dumb business decisions like sacrificing an evening to a company that doesn't care, but IMO that sort of thing is worth it now and then.

To be sure, don't give your heart away to a company (I did that exactly once, never again) because a company will never love you back. But your co-workers will.

replies(40): >>42841581 #>>42841597 #>>42841651 #>>42841813 #>>42841885 #>>42841938 #>>42842044 #>>42842177 #>>42842180 #>>42842250 #>>42842331 #>>42842374 #>>42842464 #>>42842616 #>>42842660 #>>42842679 #>>42842696 #>>42842705 #>>42842846 #>>42842996 #>>42843197 #>>42843394 #>>42843500 #>>42843507 #>>42843581 #>>42843805 #>>42843812 #>>42843830 #>>42844000 #>>42844148 #>>42844304 #>>42844779 #>>42845758 #>>42846127 #>>42847404 #>>42848237 #>>42848351 #>>42851893 #>>42870437 #>>42906633 #
4fterd4rk ◴[] No.42842331[source]
Why would I recommend a standout performer for a position at my company? So they can outshine me? I never recommend the "true believer" tool, always the average performer I got along with.
replies(5): >>42842404 #>>42842454 #>>42842458 #>>42842469 #>>42842490 #
scarface_74 ◴[] No.42842458[source]
"A players hire A players and B players hire C players”.

I’m not saying I am necessarily an “A player”. But I am secure in my skills and the ability to convince someone to pay me for my skills. I was instrumental in hiring three people at a job who were all better than me at the time. I learned so much from them while I was there, it helped set me up for my next job that was my first job as a lead.

Why would I want someone that can’t help me be successful at my current job and whom I can’t learn from?

Even there I would ask my then former coworkers first advice.

replies(1): >>42843101 #
blitzar ◴[] No.42843101[source]
99% of people hiring are "B/C players”
replies(3): >>42843419 #>>42843422 #>>42846312 #
roguecoder ◴[] No.42846312[source]
If you think so, I'm sorry for wherever you've worked.

A vs B vs C isn't some fixed thing we're assigned at birth: it's a matter of learning, investing in ourselves, having both humility and pride in our work, maintaining our boundaries and building up our coworkers.

People who have fully replaced intrinsic motivation with extrinsic motivation won't ever get to A level, because the incentives are non-linear. Actual A players keep investing and collaborating, whether they get rewarded for it now or later or never, just because it is the right thing to do.

replies(2): >>42847144 #>>42847868 #
1. blitzar ◴[] No.42847144[source]
It's a simple numbers game - the A teams hire rarely and don't turn over staff constantly and when they do hire they pick up talent internally if it exists.

The rest hire as per the quote previously, turn over staff, build empires for their own egos etc. This makes up the bulk of market facing hiring.