←back to thread

1041 points mertbio | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
keiferski ◴[] No.42839412[source]
The thing that bothers me most about layoffs due to “financial difficulties” is when you observe management wasting absurd amounts of money on something in one year, then announcing the following year that they have to make cuts to baseline, “low level” employees that don’t cost much at all.

This kind of managerial behavior seriously kills employee motivation, because it both communicates that 1) no one has job security and 2) that management is apparently incapable of managing money responsibly.

“Sorry, we spent $200k on consultants and conferences that accomplished nothing, so now we have to cut an employee making $40k” really erodes morale in ways that merely firing people doesn’t.

replies(27): >>42839478 #>>42839479 #>>42839482 #>>42839483 #>>42839696 #>>42839726 #>>42839758 #>>42839803 #>>42840179 #>>42840331 #>>42840640 #>>42840917 #>>42841170 #>>42841209 #>>42841264 #>>42841300 #>>42841377 #>>42841387 #>>42841490 #>>42841539 #>>42841743 #>>42841788 #>>42842227 #>>42842942 #>>42843762 #>>42847256 #>>42847589 #
wisty ◴[] No.42839482[source]
Managers have a budget. They can't save it, and may spend big on consultants to create a buffer for their team when cuts hit. This is especially true in government, and big companies are similar.

There is only one person who really can stop cycles hitting budgets and that is the CEO. IIRC Warren Buffett lamented the fact that the CEO is more of an investor than a manager and that spending budgets as a senior manager gives them almost no experience in setting those budgets.

replies(4): >>42839756 #>>42840435 #>>42841081 #>>42841735 #
iovrthoughtthis ◴[] No.42839756[source]
budget based economics may be the worst thing to happen to large organisations
replies(2): >>42841016 #>>42841018 #
1. IggleSniggle ◴[] No.42841016[source]
Suddenly I'm connecting the relationship between "budget based economics" and "agile" as commonly implemented. It's trying to fit creativity into a budget. In the places that do it well, it's like "We're supposed to make some really great art, here's the crayons we can afford, sorry if it's not exactly right but it's what we could manage, do whatever you can, we will take it!" In places that do it poorly, it's like "we need you to make the Uber of the Mona Lisa, I'm gonna need you to find a way to make that work, but we can totally be flexible on this, which crayons do you need."

The key differences being that in one case there's well defined constraints on resources but open ended results, and in the other the resource constraints are poorly defined but the end result is much more fixed.

replies(1): >>42841945 #
2. codr7 ◴[] No.42841945[source]
Worse is trying to fit creativity into a tight schedule.

Everything gets corrupted, today's agile is way worse than what came before in practice.