←back to thread

128 points darthShadow | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
concerndc1tizen ◴[] No.42812414[source]
If you don't like it, then why don't you use a different provider?

If you want free stuff, is your strategy to smear them into giving you more free stuff?

Storage, compute, and traffic, isn't free. You've been the beneficiary of charity for years.

Yes, the open source community has relied on this implicit charity as a parasite, by exploiting whatever free services they could. And now we're paying the price, as you say, by having DockerHub as the default provider.

My suggestion is therefore that we need independent solutions, that are fully funded as a charity, and stop relying on freemium services from corporations that fundamentally don't care about the public good.

replies(13): >>42812438 #>>42812465 #>>42812483 #>>42812503 #>>42812530 #>>42812541 #>>42812566 #>>42812595 #>>42812600 #>>42812673 #>>42812938 #>>42814023 #>>42816357 #
1. ascendantlogic ◴[] No.42814023[source]
> If you want free stuff, is your strategy to smear them into giving you more free stuff?

Docker literally offers free stuff if you follow their process. They followed the process and have gotten silence in return. Somehow that doesn't strike me as "smear them into giving you more free stuff".

Don't say you're going to do a thing if you're not going to do the thing.